Categorization of mergers and acquisitions using transaction network features

Abstract Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have occurred among tens of thousands of companies. Categorization of M&A is important to both corporate strategy and academic research. Previous research largely uses case studies and econometric data analysis to classify the motivations and types of M&A. Here, we propose understanding M&A using large-scale data to generate more applicable and generalized results. We use transaction relationships from transaction networks to better understand M&A. Based on detailed pre-analysis, including matching M&A and transaction data from Japan and clustering of transaction networks, we select several M&A observation perspectives. We use two features of transaction networks to categorize M&A cases: betweenness centrality and shortest path length. Betweenness centrality provides a view of the overall business situation from a macro perspective, and shortest path length helps to understand neighboring business environments from a micro perspective. We find several meaningful areas of concentration based on their betweenness centrality values and shortest path lengths. Finally, we re-examine M&A cases in each area, summarizing the trends identified using this categorization method. This study contributes to the M&A literature because it advances quantitative categorization of M&A cases.

[1]  John W. Goodell,et al.  Pre-merger management in developing markets: The role of earnings glamor , 2019, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[2]  H. Ono,et al.  Finding environmentally critical transmission sectors, transactions, and paths in global supply chain networks , 2017 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  R. Boschma,et al.  Who acquires whom? The role of geographical proximity and industrial relatedness in Dutch domestic M&As between 2002 and 2008 , 2015 .

[5]  Sandy J Klasa,et al.  Do Firms Have Leverage Targets? Evidence from Acquisitions , 2008 .

[6]  Towards Trade Equalisation: A Network Perspective on Trade and Income Convergence Across the Twentieth Century , 2014 .

[7]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[8]  M. Lubatkin Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm. , 1983 .

[9]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Categorization of Mergers and Acquisitions in Japan Using Corporate Databases: A Fundamental Research for Prediction , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[10]  John Campbell Selected Aspects of the Interindustry Structure of the State of Washington, 1967 , 1974 .

[11]  K. S. Reddy Extant Reviews on Entry-Mode/Internationalization, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Diversification: Understanding Theories and Establishing Interdisciplinary Research , 2014 .

[12]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  How Do Different Types of Mergers and Acquisitions Facilitate Strategic Agility? , 2014 .

[14]  Xianwen Wang,et al.  Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies , 2011, Scientometrics.

[15]  S. Borgatti,et al.  On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context , 2009 .

[16]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The role of geographic distance in completing related acquisitions: Evidence from U.S. chemical manufacturers , 2016 .

[17]  Gerasimos G. Rompotis Mergers and acquisitions: types, principles, historical information and empirical evidence from the Greek banking sector , 2015 .

[18]  Jens Leker,et al.  Uncovering the dynamics of market convergence through M&A , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[19]  J. Harford,et al.  The Importance of Industry Links in Merger Waves: The Importance of Industry Links in Merger Waves , 2014 .

[20]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Dual-energy CT for automatic organs-at-risk segmentation in brain-tumor patients using a multi-atlas and deep-learning approach , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[21]  S. Titman,et al.  Financial Structure, Acquisition Opportunities, and Firm Locations , 2009 .

[22]  Syed Shams Competition in the acquisition market and returns to bidders in Australia , 2021 .

[23]  Jarrad Harford,et al.  Trade Relationships, Indirect Economic Links, and Mergers , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Identifying and bridging networks in regional clusters , 2012 .

[25]  L. Biggiero,et al.  Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[26]  Christian F. Durach,et al.  A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management , 2017 .

[27]  Wilbur G. Lewellen A PURE FINANCIAL RATIONALE FOR THE CONGLOMERATE MERGER , 1971 .

[28]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  Extraction of business relationships in supply networks using statistical learning theory , 2016, Heliyon.

[29]  M. Ferreira,et al.  Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010 , 2014 .

[30]  Christian Staudt,et al.  NetworKit: A tool suite for large-scale complex network analysis , 2014, Network Science.

[31]  T. Mishra,et al.  Posterior analysis of mergers and acquisitions in the international financial market: A re-appraisal , 2020 .

[32]  Raphael Amit,et al.  A classification of mergers and acquisitions by motives: Analysis of market responses* , 1989 .

[33]  Brian Low,et al.  Managing business relationships and positions in industrial networks , 1997 .

[34]  Han Xia,et al.  Location, Proximity, and M&A Transactions , 2015 .

[35]  Matthew D. Crook,et al.  DOES DISTANCE MATTER IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS , 2017 .