Spatial resolution and noise properties of regularized motion-compensated image reconstruction

Reducing motion artifacts is an important problem in medical image reconstruction. Using gating to partition data into separate frames can reduce motion artifacts but can increase noise in images reconstructed fromindividual frames. One can pool the frames to reduce noise by using motion-compensated image reconstruction (MCIR) methods. MCIR methods have been studied in many medical imaging modalities to reduce both noise and motion artifacts. However, there has been less analysis of the spatial resolution and noise properties of MCIR methods. This paper analyzes the spatial resolution and noise properties of MCIR methods based on a general parametric motion model. For simplicity we consider the motion to be given. We present a method to choose quadratic spatial regularization parameters to provide predictable resolution properties that are independent of the object and the motion. The noise analysis shows that the estimator variance depends on both the measurement covariance and the Jacobian determinant values of the motion. A 2D PET simulation demonstrates the theoretical results.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Mean and covariance properties of dynamic PET reconstructions from list-mode data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Image-domain material decomposition using photon-counting CT , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Fessler,et al.  Joint estimation of image and deformation parameters in motion-corrected PET , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[7]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Analysis of Resolution and Noise Properties of Nonquadratically Regularized Image Reconstruction Methods for PET , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  John W. Clark,et al.  A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Joint image reconstruction and nonrigid motion estimation with a simple penalty that encourages local invertibility , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Lei Xing,et al.  Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Ravindra Manjeshwar,et al.  Theoretical Comparison of Motion Correction Techniques for PET Image Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[14]  W P Segars,et al.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom. , 2008, Medical physics.