This short essay takes stock of where the field of 'labour geography' has got to and where it might productively go. The first part identifies labour geography's signature characteristics as they have emerged over the last 15-20 years. These are its insistence that geography is constitutive of employment issues, its emphasis on worker agency, its analytical promiscuousness, its acute awareness of power and inequality, and its Left sensibility politically speaking. The second part of the essay is programmatic and looks to the future. It is argued that labour geographers ought to more carefully conceptualize and study worker agency; to connect labour migration more organically with existing research on place-based workers; to develop a more substantive understanding of how states regulate employment and workers' lives; to look to synthesize different geographical dimensions of worker existence and strategy; to aim to examine working peoples' lives holistically; and to be more explicit about the normative basis of their 'pro-labour' stance and its implications for worker strategy. Copyright (c) 2007 The Author. Journal Compilation(c) 2007 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[1]
A. Herod.
Workers, Space, and Labor Geography
,
2003,
International Labor and Working-Class History.
[2]
G. Mann.
Our Daily Bread: Wages, Workers, and the Political Economy of the American West
,
2007
.
[3]
Andrew Herod,et al.
From a Geography of Labor to a Labor Geography: Labor's Spatial Fix and theGeography of Capitalism
,
1997
.
[4]
A. Herod.
Towards A More Productive Engagement: Industrial Relations And Economic Geography Meet
,
2002
.
[5]
G. Malanson.
Riparian landscapes: Organizing the landscape
,
1993
.
[6]
P. Smaglik.
The lie of the land
,
2005,
Nature.
[7]
A. Herod.
Geographies of Labor Internationalism
,
2003,
Social Science History.
[8]
G. Pratt,et al.
Gender, Work and Space
,
1995
.