Use of 13C NMR Spectrometric Data To Produce a Predictive Model of Estrogen Receptor Binding Activity

We have developed a spectroscopic data-activity relationship (SDAR) model based on 13C NMR spectral data for 30 estrogenic chemicals whose relative binding affinities (RBA) are available for the alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) estrogen receptors. The SDAR models segregated the 30 compounds into strong and medium binding affinities. The SDAR model gave a leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation of 90%. Two compounds that were classified incorrectly in the SDAR model were in the transition zone between classifications. Real and predicted 13C NMR chemical shifts were used with test compounds to evaluate the predictive behavior of the SDAR model. The 13C NMR SDAR model using predicted 13C NMR data for the test compounds provides a rapid, reliable, and simple way to screen whether a compound binds to the estrogen receptors.

[1]  V. Kvasnicka.  An application of neural networks in chemistry. Prediction of13C NMR chemical shifts , 1991 .

[2]  Thuy Dao,et al.  Comparative Spectra Analysis (CoSA): Spectra as Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors for the Prediction of Biological Activities , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[3]  G. Klopman.  Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .

[4]  M. Karelson,et al.  Correlation of Boiling Points with Molecular Structure. 1. A Training Set of 298 Diverse Organics and a Test Set of 9 Simple Inorganics , 1996 .

[5]  Roger Perkins,et al.  QSAR Models for Binding of Estrogenic Compounds to Estrogen Receptor α and β Subtypes. , 1997, Endocrinology.

[6]  E. Oldfield,et al.  Secondary and tertiary structural effects on protein NMR chemical shifts: an ab initio approach. , 1993, Science.

[7]  P. Bolton,et al.  Protein φ and ψ dihedral restraints determined from multidimensional hypersurface correlations of backbone chemical shifts and their use in the determination of protein tertiary structures , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[8]  Charles L. Wilkins,et al.  Joint Neural Network Interpretation of Infrared and Mass Spectra , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  J. Gustafsson,et al.  Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors alpha and beta. , 1997, Endocrinology.

[10]  B D Sykes,et al.  Chemical shifts as a tool for structure determination. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  Gregory D. Schuler,et al.  ESTablishing a human transcript map , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[12]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships and ecological risk assessment: an overview of predictive aquatic toxicology research. , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[13]  W S Branham,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: predictions across species. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  W. Tong,et al.  Use of moment of inertia in comparative molecular field analysis to model chromatographic retention of nonpolar solutes. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  W. Welsh,et al.  A comparative molecular field analysis study of N-benzylpiperidines as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  Morton E. Munk,et al.  The Neural Network as a Tool for Multispectral Interpretation , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  W. Bremser.  Hose — a novel substructure code , 1978 .

[19]  C. Hansch,et al.  A NEW SUBSTITUENT CONSTANT, PI, DERIVED FROM PARTITION COEFFICIENTS , 1964 .

[20]  G. Klopman.  MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program , 1992 .

[21]  D. E. Patterson,et al.  Crossvalidation, Bootstrapping, and Partial Least Squares Compared with Multiple Regression in Conventional QSAR Studies , 1988 .

[22]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  Finding the 3D structure of a molecule in its IR spectrum , 1997 .

[23]  Alan R. Katritzky,et al.  Prediction of Polymer Glass Transition Temperatures Using a General Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Treatment , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[24]  H Fang,et al.  The estrogen receptor relative binding affinities of 188 natural and xenochemicals: structural diversity of ligands. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of steroid aromatase inhibitors , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[26]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  E Walum,et al.  Membrane lesions in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells exposed to metal compounds. , 1982, Toxicology.

[28]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  PowerBLAST: a new network BLAST application for interactive or automated sequence analysis and annotation. , 1997, Genome research.

[29]  Alan R. Katritzky,et al.  Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors Using a General Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Treatment , 1994 .