Tier-scalable reconnaissance: the challenge of sensor optimization, sensor deployment, sensor fusion, and sensor interoperability

Robotic reconnaissance operations are called for in extreme environments, not only those such as space, including planetary atmospheres, surfaces, and subsurfaces, but also in potentially hazardous or inaccessible operational areas on Earth, such as mine fields, battlefield environments, enemy occupied territories, terrorist infiltrated environments, or areas that have been exposed to biochemical agents or radiation. Real time reconnaissance enables the identification and characterization of transient events. A fundamentally new mission concept for tier-scalable reconnaissance of operational areas, originated by Fink et al., is aimed at replacing the engineering and safety constrained mission designs of the past. The tier-scalable paradigm integrates multi-tier (orbit atmosphere surface/subsurface) and multi-agent (satellite UAV/blimp surface/subsurface sensing platforms) hierarchical mission architectures, introducing not only mission redundancy and safety, but also enabling and optimizing intelligent, less constrained, and distributed reconnaissance in real time. Given the mass, size, and power constraints faced by such a multi-platform approach, this is an ideal application scenario for a diverse set of MEMS sensors. To support such mission architectures, a high degree of operational autonomy is required. Essential elements of such operational autonomy are: (1) automatic mapping of an operational area from different vantage points (including vehicle health monitoring); (2) automatic feature extraction and target/region-of-interest identification within the mapped operational area; and (3) automatic target prioritization for close-up examination. These requirements imply the optimal deployment of MEMS sensors and sensor platforms, sensor fusion, and sensor interoperability.

[1]  K.E. Petersen,et al.  Silicon as a mechanical material , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Sudipta Seal,et al.  Micromachined nanocrystalline SnO2 chemical gas sensors for electronic nose , 2004 .

[3]  Mark A. Tarbell,et al.  Tier-Scalable Reconnaissance Mission Test Bed: Implementation of Ground-Tier , 2007 .

[4]  Anthony S. Kourepenis,et al.  Microelectromechanical instrument and systems development at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[5]  K. Wise,et al.  First-generation hybrid MEMS gas chromatograph. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[6]  A. Holmes,et al.  Monolithic MEMS quadrupole mass spectrometers by deep silicon etching , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[7]  Trent M. Hare,et al.  Next-generation robotic planetary reconnaissance missions: A paradigm shift , 2005 .

[8]  D. Schulze-Makuch,et al.  Tier-Scalable Reconnaissance Missions For The Autonomous Exploration Of Planetary Bodies , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  Rebecca Castano,et al.  Clustering algorithm for mutually constraining heterogeneous features , 2001 .

[10]  J. Dohm,et al.  Venus, Mars, and the ices on Mercury and the moon: astrobiological implications and proposed mission designs. , 2005, Astrobiology.

[11]  Thomas George Overview of MEMS/NEMS technology development for space applications at NASA/JPL , 2003, SPIE Microtechnologies.

[12]  Wolfgang Fink,et al.  Adapter-based Microscopic and Wide-Angle Imaging Capability for Digital Cameras for Planetary Exploration and Astrobiology , 2007 .

[13]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[14]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[15]  Trent M. Hare,et al.  Next-Generation Robotic Planetary Surface/Subsurface Reconnaissance Missions: A Paradigm Shift , 2005 .

[16]  V. K. Jain,et al.  Development of micromachined vibration sensors for MEMS applications , 1999, Other Conferences.

[17]  C. Boysen,et al.  Active Signal Processing: A Counter-intuitive Approach to Enhancing Signal-to-Noise Ratio via Noise Injection , 2006 .

[18]  Edward S. Kolesar,et al.  Review and summary of a silicon micromachined gas chromatography system , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part B.

[19]  Yu-Chong Tai,et al.  Micromachined high-aspect-ratio parylene beam and its application to low-frequency seismometer , 2003, The Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2003. MEMS-03 Kyoto. IEEE.

[20]  Wolfgang Fink Generic Prioritization Framework for Target Selection and Instrument Usage for Reconnaissance Mission Autonomy , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[21]  Trent M. Hare,et al.  AUTONOMOUS TIER-SCALABLE RECONNAISSANCE MISSIONS FOR REMOTE PLANETARY EXPLORATION , 2006 .

[22]  Wolfgang Fink,et al.  AGFA: (Airborne) Automated Geologic Field Analyzer , 2005 .

[23]  Thomas George MEMS/NEMS development for space applications at NASA/JPL , 2002, Symposium on Design, Test, Integration, and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS.

[24]  Farrokh Ayazi,et al.  Micromachined inertial sensors , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  Zhen Fang,et al.  Integrated temperature and humidity sensor based MEMS , 2004, International Conference on Information Acquisition, 2004. Proceedings..

[26]  J. D. Sternhagen,et al.  Development of a micromachined hazardous gas sensor array , 2003 .

[27]  David P. Miller,et al.  MEMS-based micro instruments for in-situ planetary exploration (Keynote Paper) , 2005, SPIE Microtechnologies.

[28]  Daniel W. Wilson,et al.  Snapshot hyperspectral imaging in ophthalmology. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[29]  Wolfgang Fink,et al.  Exploration of hydrothermal targets on Mars , 2007 .