Excessive exposure to silica in the US construction industry.

Exposures to respirable dust and silica were investigated among 36 construction sites in the USA. Personal measurements (n = 151) were analyzed from 80 workers in four trades, namely bricklayers, painters (while abrasive blasting), operating engineers and laborers. Painters had the highest exposures (median values for respirable dust and silica: 13.5 and 1.28 mg/m(3), respectively), followed by laborers (2.46 and 0.350 mg/m(3)), bricklayers (2.13 and 3.20 mg/m(3)) and operating engineers (0.720 and 0.075 mg/m(3)). Mixed models were fitted to the log-transformed air levels to estimate the means and within- and between-worker variance components of the distributions in each trade. We refer to the likelihood that a typical worker from a given trade would be exposed, on average, above the occupational exposure limit (OEL) as the probability of overexposure. Given US OELs of 0.05 mg/m(3) for respirable silica and 3 mg/m(3) for respirable dust, we estimated probabilities of overexposure as between 64.5 and 100% for silica and between 8.2 and 89.2% for dust; in no instance could it be inferred with certainty that this probability was <10%. This indicates that silica exposures are grossly unacceptable in the US construction industry. While engineering and administrative interventions are needed to reduce overall air levels, the heterogeneous exposures among members of each trade suggest that controls should focus, in part, upon the individual sites, activities and equipment involved. The effects of current controls and workplace characteristics upon silica exposures were investigated among operating engineers and laborers. Silica exposures were significantly reduced by wet dust suppression (approximately 3-fold for laborers) and use of ventilated cabs (approximately 6-fold for operating engineers) and were significantly increased indoors (about 4-fold for laborers). It is concluded that urgent action is required to reduce silica exposures in the US construction industry.

[1]  S M Rappaport,et al.  A lognormal distribution-based exposure assessment method for unbalanced data. , 1997, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  H Kromhout,et al.  Application of mixed-effects models for exposure assessment. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[3]  Bindu Raju,et al.  Silica, Some Silicates, Coal Dust and Para-aramid Fibrils. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 68 , 1998, Cancer Causes & Control.

[4]  M E Lumens,et al.  Determinants of exposure to respirable quartz dust in the construction industry. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  R Riala.  Dust and quartz exposure of Finnish construction site cleaners. , 1988, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  E. Symanski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  S. Rappaport,et al.  Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. , 1991, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  S M Rappaport,et al.  An exposure-assessments strategy accounting for within- and between-worker sources of variability. , 1995, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  N A Blute,et al.  Exposure characterization for highway construction. Part I: Cut and cover and tunnel finish stages. , 1999, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[10]  P Susi,et al.  The use of a task-based exposure assessment model (T-BEAM) for assessment of metal fume exposures during welding and thermal cutting. , 2000, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Steven E Guffey,et al.  The effect of local exhaust ventilation controls on dust exposures during concrete cutting and grinding activities. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[12]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes , 1999 .

[13]  Patricia Stewart,et al.  Determinants of dust exposure in tunnel construction work. , 2002, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  R C Brown,et al.  Measurements of the effectiveness of dust control on cut-off saws used in the construction industry. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  A Goren,et al.  The variability of exposure over time: a prospective longitudinal study. , 1997, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  K. Linch,et al.  Surveillance of respirable crystalline silica dust using OSHA compliance data (1979-1995). , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  K. Linch.  Respirable concrete dust--silicosis hazard in the construction industry. , 2002, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[18]  Susan R Woskie,et al.  Exposures to quartz, diesel, dust, and welding fumes during heavy and highway construction. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[19]  L. Kupper,et al.  Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[20]  Farhang Akbar-Khanzadeh,et al.  Respirable crystalline silica dust exposure during concrete finishing (grinding) using hand-held grinders in the construction industry. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  R. Hornung,et al.  Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .