Normalizing Molecular Docking Rankings using Virtually Generated Decoys
暂无分享,去创建一个
Navdeep Jaitly | Matthieu Schapira | Izhar Wallach | Ryan H. Lilien | Kong T. Nguyen | R. Lilien | M. Schapira | Izhar Wallach | Kong T. Nguyen | N. Jaitly
[1] Egon L. Willighagen,et al. The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[2] Aniko Simon,et al. eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[3] H. Matter,et al. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] Scott P. Brown,et al. A unified, probabilistic framework for structure- and ligand-based virtual screening. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[5] Izhar Wallach,et al. Virtual Decoy Sets for Molecular Docking Benchmarks , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[6] Y. Fukunishi,et al. Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[7] Roland L. Dunbrack. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.
[8] Nicolas Moitessier,et al. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] J. Irwin,et al. ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .
[10] James G. Nourse,et al. Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[11] Christine Humblet,et al. Biased retrieval of chemical series in receptor-based virtual screening , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[12] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[13] Hege S. Beard,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[14] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[15] Anders Karlén,et al. Ligand Bias of Scoring Functions in Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[16] Conrad C. Huang,et al. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[17] G. Vigers,et al. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] J. A. Grant,et al. Gaussian docking functions. , 2003, Biopolymers.