Engaging Cooperative Research

Cooperative research involves upstream engagement of practitioners, introducing diverse knowledges and expertise in ways that can, in theory at least, generate new knowledge that is socially robust and publicly accountable. And yet, judging cooperative research solely in terms of accountability may underplay the transformative and nonaccountable/nonconvergent nature of research—the production, in other words, of the new when collectives are drawn together. Using examples from research that sought to provide environmental civil society organisations (CSOs) with the resources to shape cooperative research, this paper argues that cooperative research may not simply mark an extension of public engagement with science but can also seed an anticipatory and thus creative research process. For cooperative research to play this role there is a need to highlight the human and nonhuman attachments that underpin cooperative research activity. We argue that such activity might best have as its aim the empowerment, not simply of participants, but of the political situations that CSOs can help to foment.

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[2]  L. Pellizzoni The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason. , 2001, The British journal of sociology.

[3]  B. Smith An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns , 2014 .

[4]  A. Stirling Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[5]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[6]  M. Edelstein Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[7]  S. Whatmore Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise , 2009 .

[8]  J. Allan,et al.  Virtual Water - the Water, Food, and Trade Nexus. Useful Concept or Misleading Metaphor? , 2003 .

[9]  A. Barry,et al.  Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline , 2013 .

[10]  Siobhan Mcgrath,et al.  Fuelling global production networks with slave labour?: Migrant sugar cane workers in the Brazilian ethanol GPN , 2013 .

[11]  D. Featherstone,et al.  Resistance, Space and Political Identities , 2008 .

[12]  A. Amin,et al.  Community, economic creativity, and organization , 2008 .

[13]  L. Levidow,et al.  WP3: Water scarcity and its virtual export from Spain to the UK , 2010 .

[14]  H. Nowotny Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[16]  M. Callon The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge , 1999 .

[17]  A. Irwin The Politics of Talk , 2006 .

[18]  Michel Callon,et al.  Acting in an uncertain world , 2009 .

[19]  Noortje Marres,et al.  Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate , 2005 .

[20]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .

[21]  N. Marres,et al.  Materials and devices of the public: an introduction , 2011 .

[22]  S. Whatmore Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world , 2006 .

[23]  S. Whatmore,et al.  Including Nonhumans in Political Theory: Opening the Pandora’s Box? , 2010 .

[24]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[25]  Catharina Landström,et al.  Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public , 2011 .

[26]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[27]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Breaking the Waves in Science Studies , 2003 .

[28]  Alexander Bogner,et al.  The Paradox of Participation Experiments , 2012 .