Charge dependent calculations of single particle energies in nuclei around O-16 with modern nucleon nucleon interactions

The binding energies of the ground states and several excited states related to single-particle and -hole states in nuclei around $^{16}\mathrm{O}$ are calculated taking charge dependence into account. Effective interactions on the particle basis are constructed from modern charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon interactions and the Coulomb force within the framework of the unitary-model-operator approach. Single-particle (-hole) energies are obtained from the energy differences of the binding energies between a particle (hole) state in $^{17}\mathrm{O}$ or $^{17}\mathrm{F}$ ($^{15}\mathrm{N}$ or $^{15}\mathrm{O}$) and the ground state of $^{16}\mathrm{O}$. The resultant spin-orbit splittings are small for the hole state and large for the particle state in comparison with the experimental values though the differences between the experimental and calculated values are not very large. The charge dependence of the calculated single-particle energies for the ground states are in good agreement with the experimental values. Furthermore, the Thomas-Ehrman shift due to the Coulomb force for the $1{s}_{1∕2}$ states in $^{17}\mathrm{O}$ and $^{17}\mathrm{F}$ can be observed.

[1]  T. Kuo,et al.  Ground-state properties of closed-shell nuclei with low-momentum realistic interactions , 2003, nucl-th/0305061.

[2]  S. Bogner,et al.  Model independent low momentum nucleon interaction from phase shift equivalence , 2003, nucl-th/0305035.

[3]  D. R. Entem,et al.  Accurate charge dependent nucleon nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory , 2003, nucl-th/0304018.

[4]  K. Gad,et al.  Ground state of finite nuclei evaluated from realistic interactions , 2002, nucl-th/0205025.

[5]  W. Gloeckle,et al.  The α particle based on modern nuclear forces , 2001, nucl-th/0112026.

[6]  P. Navrátil,et al.  Six-nucleon spectroscopy from a realistic nonlocal Hamiltonian. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[7]  B. A. Brown,et al.  Magic numbers in exotic nuclei and spin-isospin properties of the NN interaction. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[8]  S. C. Pieper,et al.  Benchmark Test Calculation of a Four-Nucleon Bound State , 2001, nucl-th/0104057.

[9]  J. Krommes,et al.  Fundamental Statistical Descriptions of Plasma Turbulence in Magnetic Fields , 2001 .

[10]  Suzuki,et al.  New magic number, N = 16, near the neutron drip line , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  R. Okamoto,et al.  Three-Body Cluster Effects on Λ Single-Particle Energies in Λ17O and Λ41Ca , 2000 .

[12]  A. Polls,et al.  Two-body correlations in nuclear systems , 2000, nucl-th/0001007.

[13]  P. Navrátil,et al.  Few-nucleon systems in a translationally invariant harmonic oscillator basis , 1999, nucl-th/9907054.

[14]  H. Nakada,et al.  Thomas-Ehrman shifts in nuclei around 16O and role of residual nuclear interaction , 1999, nucl-th/9902030.

[15]  J. Heisenberg,et al.  Ground state correlations and mean field in 16 O , 1998, nucl-th/9802029.

[16]  S. Koonin,et al.  Shell-model Monte Carlo studies of neutron-rich nuclei in the 1s-0d-1p-0f shells , 1997, nucl-th/9708039.

[17]  M. Baldo,et al.  BETHE-BRUECKNER-GOLDSTONE EXPANSION IN NUCLEAR MATTER , 1998 .

[18]  K. Ikeda,et al.  Thomas-Ehrman effect ons1/2andp1/2resonance states in10C+p , 1998 .

[19]  R. Okamoto,et al.  Ground-State Properties of 40Ca in Unitary-Model-Operator Approach with Realistic Nucleon-Nucleon Potentials , 1997 .

[20]  Song,et al.  Nonlocal nature of the nuclear force and its impact on nuclear structure. , 1996, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[21]  Ray,et al.  Two-nucleon potential from chiral Lagrangians. , 1995, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[22]  M. Hjorth-Jensen,et al.  Realistic effective interactions for nuclear systems , 1995 .

[23]  R. Okamoto,et al.  Effective Interaction Theory and Unitary-Model-Operator Approach to Nuclear Saturation Problem , 1994 .

[24]  Stoks,et al.  Construction of high-quality NN potential models. , 1994, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[25]  Ray,et al.  Nucleon-nucleon potential from an effective chiral Lagrangian. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[26]  A. H. Wapstra,et al.  The 1993 atomic mass evaluation: (I) Atomic mass table , 1993 .

[27]  D. R. Tilley,et al.  Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A =1 6 , 1993 .

[28]  Pieper,et al.  Origins of spin-orbit splitting in 15N. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[29]  Zheng,et al.  Spin-orbit splitting for single-particle and single-hole energies: Interplay of relativity and core polarization. , 1992, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[30]  S. Weinberg Effective chiral lagrangians for nucleonpion interactions and nuclear forces , 1991 .

[31]  F. Ajzenberg‐Selove Energy levels of light nuclei A = 13-15 , 1991 .

[32]  Steven Weinberg,et al.  Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians , 1990 .

[33]  T. Kuo,et al.  Folded-diagram theory of the effective interaction in nuclei, atoms and molecules , 1990 .

[34]  Suzuki,et al.  Nuclear ground-state properties and nuclear forces in the unitary-model-operator approach: Application to 16O. , 1987, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[35]  R. Okamoto,et al.  Effects of Self-Consistent Single-Particle Potential on Nuclear Effective Interaction , 1987 .

[36]  Ma,et al.  Model-space nuclear matter calculations with the Paris nucleon-nucleon potential. , 1986, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[37]  Kenji Suzuki Construction of Hermitian Effective Interaction in Nuclei--General Relation between Hermitian and Non-Hermitian Forms , 1982 .

[38]  H. Bandō,et al.  Single-Particle Spin-Orbit Splittings in Nuclei , 1981 .

[39]  André Lejeune,et al.  Many Body Theory of Nuclear Matter , 1976 .

[40]  C. Wong Application of the reaction matrix theory (I). The calculation of nuclear reaction matrix elements , 1967 .

[41]  S. Okubo Diagonalization of Hamiltonian and Tamm-Dancoff Equation , 1954 .

[42]  R. Thomas An Analysis of the Energy Levels of the Mirror Nuclei, C 13 and N 13 , 1952 .

[43]  J. B. Ehrman ON THE DISPLACEMENT OF CORRESPONDING ENERGY LEVELS OF C$sup 13$ AND N$sup 1$$sup 3$ , 1951 .