Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority

Abstract Due to dynamic competition, the gain of autonomy through port devolution and the resulting evolution towards accountability in diverse fields of performance, port authorities (PAs) evolve from landlords that are strongly embedded in the public domain to more autonomous acting organizations with stronger requirements for ‘business like’ performance. This evolution implies a stronger need for proper strategic analysis and subsequent strategy formulation, evaluation and implementation. Based on the main current strategic challenges that PAs face, we define and position the PA as an organization combining both public and private values and analyze the validity of the lenses of different theoretical perspectives from strategy and public management research for its strategic analysis. We argue that the strategic challenges' PAs face in their current operating environment, also reflect the evolution in strategic management thinking, whereby more actor-related attributes are added to the various research frameworks, loosening the traditional strict conditions of profit maximization, rationality and transparency and whereby more integrated concepts like co-evolution and network theory gain importance. We also conclude that PAs as shared value organizations are interesting domains for academic research based in the strategy domain, as to strengthen the analytical base that is available for research into the strategy of organizations.

[1]  M. Horst,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[2]  O. Williamson OUTSOURCING: TRANSACTION COST ECONOMICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT† , 2008 .

[3]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[4]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[5]  T. Notteboom Chapter 2 Strategic Challenges to Container Ports in a Changing Market Environment , 2006 .

[6]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[7]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[8]  James G. Combs,et al.  Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics , 1999 .

[9]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector , 2007 .

[10]  Jonathan G. S. Koppell The Politics of Quasi-Government: Hybrid Organizations and the Dynamics of Bureaucratic Control , 2003 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[12]  T. J. Brignall,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the 'New Public Sector' , 2000 .

[13]  H. Meersman,et al.  Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports , 2001 .

[14]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[15]  Julián Pando *,et al.  Marketing management at the world's major ports , 2005 .

[16]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[17]  O. Williamson The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations , 1971 .

[18]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? , 2010 .

[19]  Stephen Cahoon,et al.  Marketing communications for seaports: a matter of survival and growth , 2007 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[21]  R. Goss,et al.  Economic policies and seaports: Strategies for port authorities , 1990 .

[22]  Taco Brandsen,et al.  Hybrid Organizations: No Cause for Concern? , 2011 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[24]  H. Demsetz Toward a Theory of Property Rights , 1967 .

[25]  Gerald F. Gaus,et al.  Public and private in social life , 1985 .

[26]  Gary L. Wamsley,et al.  The political economy of public organizations , 1973 .

[27]  S. Llewellyn,et al.  Strategy in the public sector: Management in the wilderness , 2003 .

[28]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Chapter 19 Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools , 2006 .

[29]  Raymond Dart,et al.  Being “Business-Like” in a Nonprofit Organization: A Grounded and Inductive Typology , 2004 .

[30]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Stakeholders relations management in ports: dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment , 2002 .

[31]  A. Lewin,et al.  Prolegomena on Coevolution: a Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[32]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[33]  R. Rojas A Review of Models for Measuring Organizational Effectiveness Among For‐Profit and Nonprofit Organizations , 2000 .

[34]  Brian Slack,et al.  Regional governance of port development in China: a case study of Shanghai International Shipping Center , 2004 .

[35]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[36]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[37]  O. Williamson,et al.  Transaction Cost Economics , 1995 .

[38]  Richard C. Box Running Government Like a Business , 1999 .

[39]  Pat Walsh,et al.  Public Management: The New Zealand Model , 1996 .

[40]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[41]  Cisca Joldersma,et al.  Strategic Management in Hybrid Organizations , 2002 .

[42]  Hospice of the Red River Valley: A nonprofit's response to for-profit competition , 2012 .

[43]  D. Billis Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector , 2010 .

[44]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Chapter 3 Transaction cost economics , 1989 .

[45]  Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Faculty Port reform toolkit , 2003 .

[46]  J. Child Context, Comparison, and Methodology in Chinese Management Research , 2009, Management and Organization Review.

[47]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[48]  R. Kaplan Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations , 2001 .

[49]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  Port Governance Reforms in Diversified Institutional Frameworks: Generic Solutions, Implementation Asymmetries , 2010 .

[50]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[51]  Francesco Parola,et al.  Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform , 2011 .

[52]  O. Williamson The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes , 1981 .

[53]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[54]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[55]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010) , 2013 .

[56]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Port privatization policy and practice , 2002 .

[57]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[58]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Chapter 17 Port Governance, Devolution and the Matching Framework: A Configuration Theory Approach , 2006 .

[59]  Giovanni Satta,et al.  Emerging Port Authority communication strategies: Assessing the determinants of disclosure in the annual report , 2013 .

[60]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[61]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[62]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports , 2005 .

[63]  O. Hart Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications , 1995 .

[64]  David J. Collis,et al.  Corporate Strategy : Resources and the Scope of the Firm , 1996 .

[65]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of , 2013 .

[66]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Chapter 18 Governance Models Defined , 2006 .

[67]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[68]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  Southern European Ports and the Spatial Distribution of EDCs , 2006 .

[69]  T. Notteboom,et al.  A resource-based perspective on strategic port planning , 1996 .

[70]  Anna Sciomachen,et al.  Modal split evaluation of a maritime container terminal , 2009 .

[71]  R. Rumelt Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[72]  Stephen Cahoon,et al.  Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world? , 2010 .

[73]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Seaport research: a structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s , 2011 .

[74]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Public and Private Management: What's the Difference? , 2002 .

[75]  Peter W. De Langen,et al.  A new approach to granting terminal concessions: the case of the Rotterdam World Gateway terminal , 2012 .

[76]  R. Robinson Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[77]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Terminal concessions in seaports revisited , 2012 .

[78]  J. Child,et al.  The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co‐Evolution , 2012 .

[79]  Graham T Allison,et al.  Public and private management : are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? , 1988 .

[80]  D. Ford,et al.  How should companies interact in business networks , 2002 .

[81]  S. Bretschneider,et al.  The "Publicness Puzzle" in Organization Theory: A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations* , 1994 .

[82]  A. Friedman,et al.  Stakeholders: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[83]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .