Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation

Aim: Non-participation in health surveys is a common phenomenon. When differences between participants and non-participants are considerable, the external validity of the sample survey may decrease and false conclusions might be drawn about the health status of the population. For this reason, the authors aimed to investigate the representativity of a postal questionnaire survey performed in the county of Scania, Sweden, in 1999—2000. The survey, which was based on an 18- to 80-year-old population sample, had a 58% response rate (n = 13 604). Methods: For some variables, the information obtained using the questionnaire was compared with information obtained from a population register that covers all the population in the county (for the 18- to 80-year-old group, n = 850 476). The population register includes, among other data, information on age, gender, educational level, country of birth, and healthcare expenditure. Results: Men, individuals with a low level of education, and immigrants were under-represented in the survey. However, except for immigrants, the under-representation was not large. Among immigrants, particularly those born in former Yugoslavia, the Arabic-speaking countries, and Poland were very significantly under-represented in the study. By contrast, immigrants born in other Nordic countries had responded to almost the same extent as respondents born in Sweden. The survey sample had about the same healthcare utilization costs as did the general population. Conclusions: In summary, the ``Health Survey for Scania, 2000'' seems largely representative of the total Scanian population. A major concern, however, is the under-representation of the immigrant population.

[1]  G. Berglund,et al.  Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[2]  I Russell,et al.  Statistics--with confidence? , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[3]  H. Storm,et al.  Validity and Representativity in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group , 2003, Acta oncologica.

[4]  Chen-Huan Chen,et al.  Characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non- participation in a population survey in Kin-Hu, Kinmen , 1997, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[5]  R. Munger,et al.  The effect of follow-up on limiting non-participation bias in genetic epidemiologic investigations , 1998, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[6]  A. Marcus,et al.  Non-participation in telephone follow-up interviews. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[7]  J. Lynch,et al.  Social inequalities in health- do they diminish with age? Revisiting the question in Sweden 1999 , 2003, International journal for equity in health.

[8]  O. Johnell,et al.  Non-participants differ from participants as regards risk factors for vertebral deformities , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  C. Ohlson,et al.  Participants and Non-participants of Different Categories in a Health Survey: A Cross-sectional Register Study , 1985, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[10]  A F Subar,et al.  Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  G. Berglund,et al.  The Malmö diet and cancer study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non‐participants , 2001, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[12]  H. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of participants with non-participants in a population-based epidemiologic study: the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. , 1997, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[13]  G. Law,et al.  The importance of full participation: lessons from a national case–control study , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  T. Joiner,et al.  Health beliefs and illness attitudes as predictors of breast cancer screening attendance. , 2001, European journal of public health.

[15]  R. Hayes,et al.  Factors impacting questionnaire response in a Dutch retrospective cohort study. , 2004, Annals of epidemiology.

[16]  C. Björkelund,et al.  Participation bias in longitudinal studies: experience from the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden , 2003, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[17]  H. Christensen,et al.  Predictors of refusal to participate: a longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia , 2002, BMC public health.