Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover, DES PCI is affected by vasomotion impairment. In ACS a high thrombus burden and vasospasm lead to a higher risk of acute and late acquired stent malapposition than in stable patients. This increases the risk of acute, late and very late stent thrombosis. In this challenging clinical setting, the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) could represent an appealing therapeutic option. Temporary vessel scaffolding has proved to have several advantages over metallic stent delivery, such as framework reabsorption, late lumen enlargement, side branch patency, and recovery of physiological reactivity to vasoactive stimuli. In the thrombotic environment of ACS, BVS implantation has the benefit of capping the thrombus and the vulnerable plaque. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds also seems to reduce the incidence of angina during follow-up. Acute coronary syndromes patients may therefore benefit more from temporary polymeric caging than from permanent stent platform implantation. The aim of this review is to update the available knowledge concerning the use of BVS in ACS patients, by analyzing the potential pitfalls in this challenging clinical setting and presenting tricks to overcome these limitations.

[1]  J. Wykrzykowska,et al.  Appropriate use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in percutaneous coronary interventions: a recommendation from experienced users , 2015, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[2]  V. Kocka,et al.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’ , 2014, European heart journal.

[3]  Z. Siudak,et al.  Use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndromes. Polish National Registry. , 2014, Kardiologia polska.

[4]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? , 2012, European heart journal.

[5]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Initial experience and clinical evaluation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in real-world practice: the AMC Single Centre Real World PCI Registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary ste , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for treatment of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: BVS STEMI first study. , 2014, European heart journal.

[9]  J. Ormiston,et al.  An independent bench comparison of two bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary scaffolds (Absorb and DESolve) with a durable metallic drug-eluting stent (ML8/Xpedition). , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Fernández-Rodríguez,et al.  Acute Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: to stent or not to stent? , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  T. Münzel,et al.  Clinical, Angiographic, Functional, and Imaging Outcomes 12 Months After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[13]  S. Brugaletta,et al.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction – ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation? , 2015, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[14]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Late Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis With Long-Term Follow-Up , 2006, Circulation.

[15]  E. Edelman,et al.  Stent Thrombogenicity Early in High-Risk Interventional Settings Is Driven by Stent Design and Deployment and Protected by Polymer-Drug Coatings , 2011, Circulation.

[16]  Elias Sanidas,et al.  A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Beyond the early stages: insights from the ASSURE registry on bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  G. Stone,et al.  How to minimize stent thrombosis. , 2011, Circulation.

[19]  Chi‐Hang Lee,et al.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  R. Whitbourn,et al.  Lessons learned from acute and late scaffold failures in the ABSORB EXTEND trial. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  M. Bennett,et al.  Expansion and malapposition characteristics after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation , 2014, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  Z. Siudak,et al.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the POLAR ACS study. , 2014, Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej.

[23]  M. Togni,et al.  Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[25]  M. Valgimigli,et al.  Zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in uncertain drug-eluting stent candidates. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  J. Jąkała,et al.  Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Optical coherence tomography evaluation and clinical outcomes. , 2015, Cardiology journal.

[27]  C. Hamm,et al.  Current status of bioresorbable scaffolds in the treatment of coronary artery disease. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[29]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Short-term outcome of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold , 2014, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[30]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Incidence, Mechanism, Predictors, and Long-Term Prognosis of Late Stent Malapposition After Bare-Metal Stent Implantation , 2004, Circulation.

[31]  R. Virmani,et al.  Long-Term Safety of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Cobalt-Chromium XIENCE V Stent in a Porcine Coronary Artery Model , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[32]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Endothelial-dependent vasomotion in a coronary segment treated by ABSORB everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system is related to plaque composition at the time of bioresorption of the polymer: indirect finding of vascular reparative therapy? , 2012, European heart journal.

[33]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  Circumferential evaluation of the neointima by optical coherence tomography after ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: can the scaffold cap the plaque? , 2012, Atherosclerosis.

[34]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: a European perspective. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[35]  M. Valgimigli PROlonging Dual antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY , 2011 .

[36]  C. Di Mario,et al.  ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[37]  Gijs van Soest,et al.  OCT assessment of the long-term vascular healing response 5 years after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[39]  T. Münzel,et al.  Early outcome after implantation of Absorb bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[40]  A. Ielasi,et al.  Immediate and midterm outcomes following primary PCI with bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction: insights from the multicentre "Registro ABSORB Italiano" (RAI registry). , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.