Information, Incentives, and Commitment in Regulatory Mechanisms: Regulatory Innovation in Telecommunications

The incentive theory of regulation has generally been developed in the context of monopoly regulation or of supply by a publicly owned firm and thus is most applicable to state regulation of local telephone companies.1 Although this theory may not be directly applicable to those segments of the telecommunications industry that are, or soon will be, sufficiently competitive that regulation will not be needed, the principles identified may be applicable to the transition period from regulation to competition. The theory presented here thus is viewed as pertaining to the transition to competition and to the regulation of local telephone service which, in spite of the alternative of cellular and cable systems, is likely to remain regulated for the foreseeable future. The article thus focuses on cost-based pricing policies and the associated incentive problems with particular emphasis on longterm policies that respond to information that is generated through performance in earlier periods. The regulatory mechanisms considered are in the spirit of recent policy proposals to delegate to the firm the authority to make certain decisions subject only to caps on profits or prices. The mechanisms prescribe a set of implementable policies and delegate to the firm the choice of a particular policy based on the information it has about its costs. The policies cover extended periods of time, so they may include provisions that allow prices to adapt to information revealed by either exogenous events or performance in earlier periods.

[1]  J. Laffont Information and Regulation , 1991 .

[2]  J. Laffont,et al.  Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  J. Laffont,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF INCENTIVE CONTRACTS , 1988 .

[4]  D. Sappington Limited liability contracts between principal and agent , 1983 .

[5]  David P. Baron,et al.  Design of regulatory mechanisms and institutions , 1989 .

[6]  Bernard Caillaud,et al.  Government Intervention in Production and Incentives Theory: A Review of Recent Contributions , 1988 .

[7]  David P. Baron,et al.  Monitoring, moral hazard, asymmetric information, and risk sharing in procurement contracting , 1987 .

[8]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Regulation and information in a continuing relationship , 1984 .

[9]  Yrjana Tolonen,et al.  Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics:, "Foreign Trade in the Centrally Planned Economy." In Vol. 27, Chur: Harwood Academic, 1988. ix + 77 pp. $33.00 , 1990 .

[10]  David P. Baron,et al.  Commitment and Fairness in a Dynamic Regulatory Relationship , 1987 .

[11]  D. Sappington Optimal Regulation of a Multiproduct Monopoly with Unknown Technological Capabilities , 1983 .

[12]  Jean-Jacques Laffont,et al.  A complete solution to a class of principal-agent problems with an application to the control of a self-managed firm , 1984 .

[13]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Incentive Regulation For Electric Utilities , 1986 .

[14]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[15]  David Besanko,et al.  Designing Regulatory Policy with Limited Information: Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics 20 , 1987 .

[16]  David P. Baron,et al.  Monitoring of Performance in Organizational Contracting: The Case of Defense Procurement , 1988 .

[17]  R. Noll Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation , 1989 .