Practice enhancement: optimising teaching performance in schools

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that in comparison to performance appraisal, “practice enhancement” is offered as a conceptual tool that can be used to develop strategies for reflecting on, communicating changes in and planning for excellence in teaching practice.Design/methodology/approach – The conceptual notion of practice enhancement is underpinned by assumptions from the discipline of positive psychology and supported by the need for a performance management process targeting teaching practice that considers the contributions made by social learning theory and organisational learning theory. Indicative of a postmodern persuasion, a data “story” from case study research is used to support the applicability of practice enhancement in schools. Actor‐network theory is used to analyse movements in local professional learning preferences and practices in an independent boys' school in Australia.Findings – The paper finds that applicability and conceptual accuracy of managerial notions such a...

[1]  Nick Lee,et al.  Otherness and the Actor Network , 1994 .

[2]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Bookshelf - High Output Management, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization , 2006, IEEE Softw..

[3]  H. Blumer.  What Is Wrong with Social Theory , 1954 .

[4]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[5]  John Law,et al.  Notes on Materiality and Sociality , 1995 .

[6]  Sandra M. Chafouleas,et al.  Introducing positive psychology: Finding a place within school psychology , 2004 .

[7]  M. Volman,et al.  Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern , 1994 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[9]  Monica Dianne Mulcahy.  Designing the user/using the design : of competency training and vocational education practices , 1997 .

[10]  John Chandler,et al.  Between the Ivory Tower and the Academic Assembly Line , 2001 .

[11]  M. Coleman,et al.  Managing “challenging” teachers , 2005 .

[12]  A Balanced School Accountability Model: An Alternative to High-Stakes Testing , 2004 .

[13]  D. Guest.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS[1] , 1987 .

[14]  C. Fletcher.  Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda , 2001 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[16]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Positive psychology. An introduction. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[17]  C. Cardno.  Leadership and professional development: the quiet revolution , 2005 .

[18]  Gary E. Roberts.  Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation: A Technique That Works , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Dictionary of qualitative inquiry , 2001 .

[20]  Keith Grint,et al.  What's Wrong With Performance Appraisals? A Critique and A Suggestion , 1993 .

[21]  Eileen Piggot‐Irvine,et al.  Key features of appraisal effectiveness , 2003 .

[22]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[23]  Ebrahim Soltani,et al.  Towards a TQM‐driven HR performance evaluation: an empirical study , 2003 .

[24]  J. Hassard,et al.  Symmetrical Absence/Symmetrical Absurdity: Critical Notes on the Production of Actor-Network Accounts , 2004 .

[25]  Anthony H. Normore.  The Edge of Chaos: School Administrators and Accountability. , 2004 .

[26]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[27]  T. Garavan.  The learning organization: a review and evaluation , 1997 .

[28]  E. Whitener.  Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? , 2001 .

[29]  J. Simmons.  An “expert witness” perspective on performance appraisal in universities and colleges , 2002 .

[30]  D. Epstein.  Defining Accountability in Education , 1993 .

[31]  C. Porter,et al.  Appraisal pitfalls and the training implications – Part 2 , 2004 .

[32]  R. Gratton.  Teacher appraisal: a lesson on confusion over purpose , 2004 .

[33]  Peter Grootenboer,et al.  Bureaucratic Control or Professional Autonomy?: Performance management in New Zealand schools , 2003 .