Bayesian inference using Hamiltonian Monte‐Carlo algorithm for nonlinear joint modeling in the context of cancer immunotherapy

Treatment evaluation in advanced cancer mainly relies on overall survival and tumor size dynamics. Both markers and their association can be simultaneously analyzed by using joint models, and these approaches are supported by many softwares or packages. However, these approaches are essentially limited to linear models for the longitudinal part, which limit their biological interpretation. More biological models of tumor dynamics can be obtained by using nonlinear models, but they are limited by the fact that parameter identifiability require rich dataset. In that context Bayesian approaches are particularly suited to incorporate the biological knowledge and increase the information available, but they are limited by the high computing cost of Monte-Carlo by Markov Chains algorithms. Here, we aimed to assess the performances of the Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo (HMC) algorithm implemented in Stan for inference in a nonlinear joint model. The method was validated on simulated data where HMC provided proper posterior distributions and credibility intervals in a reasonable computational time. Then the association between tumor size dynamics and survival was assessed in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer treated with atezolizumab, an immunotherapy agent. HMC confirmed limited sensitivity to prior distributions. A cross-validation approach was developed and identified the current slope of tumor size dynamics as the most relevant driver of survival. In summary, HMC is an efficient approach to perform nonlinear joint models in a Bayesian framework, and opens the way for the use of nonlinear models to characterize both the rapid dynamics and the intersubject variability observed during cancer immunotherapy treatment.

[1]  France Mentré,et al.  Nonlinear joint models for individual dynamic prediction of risk of death using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: application to metastatic prostate cancer , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[2]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[3]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Rank-Normalization, Folding, and Localization: An Improved Rˆ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion) , 2019, Bayesian Analysis.

[4]  Jouko Lampinen,et al.  Bayesian Model Assessment and Comparison Using Cross-Validation Predictive Densities , 2002, Neural Computation.

[5]  D. Munn,et al.  Indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase contributes to tumor cell evasion of T cell‐mediated rejection , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Dimitris Rizopoulos,et al.  The R Package JMbayes for Fitting Joint Models for Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data using MCMC , 2014, 1404.7625.

[7]  Benjamin Wu,et al.  Association Between Tumor Size Kinetics and Survival in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab: Implication for Patient Follow‐Up , 2019, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  Jin Y. Jin,et al.  Progress and Opportunities to Advance Clinical Cancer Therapeutics Using Tumor Dynamic Models , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Estimation of tumour regression and growth rates during treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Maria Sudell,et al.  Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[11]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[12]  France Mentré,et al.  Nonlinear Mixed-Effect Models for Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics and Link with Survival in the Context of Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Comparison by Simulation of Two-Stage and Joint Approaches , 2015, The AAPS Journal.

[13]  Dimitris Rizopoulos,et al.  An Overview of Joint Modeling of Time-to-Event and Longitudinal Outcomes , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[14]  S. Culine,et al.  Pembrolizumab as Second‐Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection , 2015, Stat. Comput..

[16]  M. Wulfsohn,et al.  A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. , 1997, Biometrics.

[17]  Dimitris Rizopoulos,et al.  JM: An R package for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data , 2010 .

[18]  G. Long,et al.  Patterns of Response and Progression to Immunotherapy. , 2018, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[19]  France Mentré,et al.  Using the SAEM algorithm for mechanistic joint models characterizing the relationship between nonlinear PSA kinetics and survival in prostate cancer patients , 2017, Biometrics.

[20]  Benoit Liquet,et al.  Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package lcmm , 2015, 1503.00890.

[21]  Wei Shen,et al.  JMFit: A SAS Macro for Joint Models of Longitudinal and Survival Data. , 2016, Journal of statistical software.

[22]  V. Servois,et al.  Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  P. Hegde,et al.  Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[24]  Manash S. Chatterjee,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Tumor Size Dynamics in Pembrolizumab‐Treated Advanced Melanoma , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[25]  James T. Thorson,et al.  Faster estimation of Bayesian models in ecology using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2017 .

[26]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[27]  Anyue Yin,et al.  A Review of Mathematical Models for Tumor Dynamics and Treatment Resistance Evolution of Solid Tumors , 2019, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[28]  Marc Lavielle,et al.  Joint modelling of longitudinal and repeated time-to-event data using nonlinear mixed-effects models and the stochastic approximation expectation–maximization algorithm , 2015 .

[29]  Eric Bair,et al.  Cross-validation for nonlinear mixed effects models , 2013, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[30]  D Commenges,et al.  Analysis of left-censored longitudinal data with application to viral load in HIV infection. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[31]  H. Kohrt,et al.  Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients , 2014, Nature.

[32]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  Wei Liu,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal and Survival Data: Joint Modeling, Inference Methods, and Issues , 2012 .