Effect of monetite reinforced into the chitosan-based lyophilized 3D scaffolds on physicochemical, mechanical, and osteogenic properties

Abstract Chitosan and monetite nanoparticles-based composite scaffold with tailored structures and properties possesses tremendous potential for bone restoration. Here, we aimed to enhance the physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of a three-dimensional composite scaffold by the addition of monetite nanoparticles into a chitosan matrix with varying content of monetite in the developed scaffolds. The scaffolds were fabricated from the viscous slurry containing chitosan and nano monetite particles using a free-drying process. Macro-porous scaffolds were fabricated by incorporation of nano-sized monetite particles up to 20 wt% of total chitosan concentration into pure chitosan solution. These are then characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), FTIR, and field emission electron microscope (FESEM). Results revealed that the chitosan/monetite composite scaffolds showed highly porous architecture with an average pore size varying between 90 and 390 µm, and high interconnected porosity varying from 77 to 88%, respectively. Scaffold containing 20 wt% monetite (CS-M20) revealed the highest compressive strength of 1.93 MPa, which is closely matching with that of the lower range of compressive strength in cancellous bone. The incorporation of monetite content into the chitosan matrix significantly diminished (p < 0.05) pore size, and porosity and retarded the rate of biodegradation of the monetite-containing scaffolds as evident from 20 wt% and 38 wt% of weight loss in CSM20 and CSM10 scaffolds after 28 days of incubation in a sterile PBS. Monetite-containing scaffolds showed a higher ability of mineralization as compared to the pristine chitosan (CS-M0) scaffold, depositing bone-like carbonated hydroxyapatite crystals onto their surface after 14 days of immersion in SBF at 37 °C. A higher extent of lamellipodia and filopodia protrusions and superior spreading behavior of osteoblasts were noticed in FESEM images of MG-63 cultured monetite containing scaffolds. MTT assay exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) MG-63 cell proliferation in monetite-containing CS-M20 scaffold than that in pristine chitosan scaffold suggesting the fact that monetite nanoparticles incorporation into the chitosan matrix stimulated superior osteoblast attachment and proliferation. Further, immunocytochemistry analysis of MG-63 cultured onto developed scaffolds revealed higher osteogenic activity and differentiation ability in CS-M20 scaffold as compared to pristine chitosan scaffold. The obtained results demonstrated that the monetite-containing scaffolds have a great potential for the regeneration of bone tissue defects. Graphical Abstract

[1]  Z. Qian,et al.  Polysaccharide hydrogels: Functionalization, construction and served as scaffold for tissue engineering. , 2021, Carbohydrate polymers.

[2]  S. Shamim,et al.  Enhancing osteoblast differentiation through small molecule-incorporated engineered nanofibrous scaffold , 2021, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  MyungGu Yeo,et al.  Investigating the physical characteristics and cellular interplay on 3D-printed scaffolds depending on the incorporated silica size for hard tissue regeneration , 2021 .

[4]  Sung‐Wook Choi,et al.  Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of alendronate-conjugated nanodiamonds for potential osteoporosis treatment , 2021, Biomaterials Research.

[5]  Anan Athipornchai,et al.  Development of mangiferin loaded chitosan-silica hybrid scaffolds: Physicochemical and bioactivity characterization. , 2021, Carbohydrate polymers.

[6]  S. Davaran,et al.  Osteogenic effects of the bioactive small molecules and minerals in the scaffold-based bone tissue engineering. , 2020, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[7]  M. Epple,et al.  Hybrid chitosan/gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds promote odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells and in vitro biomineralization. , 2020, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  J. San Román,et al.  Osseointegration of Antimicrobial Acrylic Bone Cements Modified with Graphene Oxide and Chitosan , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[9]  A. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Natural hydroxyapatite/diopside nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications: physical, mechanical, bioactivity and biodegradation evaluation , 2020, Materials Technology.

[10]  Chaodi Xu,et al.  A chitosan based scaffold with enhanced mechanical and biocompatible performance for biomedical applications , 2020 .

[11]  Gerry L. Koons,et al.  Materials design for bone-tissue engineering , 2020, Nature Reviews Materials.

[12]  Edgar Dörsam,et al.  3D-Printing of Hierarchically Designed and Osteoconductive Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2020, Materials.

[13]  Yan Liu,et al.  Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration , 2020, International Journal of Oral Science.

[14]  Yogendra Pratap Singh,et al.  Optimization of electrospinning process & parameters for producing defect-free chitosan/polyethylene oxide nanofibers for bone tissue engineering , 2020, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[15]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Preparation and characterization of glass–ceramic reinforced alginate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2019, Journal of Materials Research.

[16]  Yogendra Pratap Singh,et al.  Preparation, characterization and bioactivities of nano anhydrous calcium phosphate added gelatin–chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2019, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[17]  K. Pandian,et al.  Halloysite Nanotube-Reinforced Ion-Incorporated Hydroxyapatite-Chitosan Composite Coating on Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy for Implant Application , 2019, Journal of Chemistry.

[18]  Xiaofeng Jia,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Scaffold Structural Microenvironmental Cues to Guide Tissue Regeneration in Bone Tissue Applications , 2018, Nanomaterials.

[20]  N. Selvamurugan,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: Scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. , 2018, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[21]  A. Eliopoulos,et al.  Chitosan/gelatin scaffolds support bone regeneration , 2018, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[22]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  The Synergy of Scaffold-Based and Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineering Strategies. , 2018, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  Chia-Hung Huang,et al.  Graphene oxide conjugated with polymers: a study of culture condition to determine whether a bacterial growth stimulant or an antimicrobial agent? , 2018, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[24]  Hyoun‐Ee Kim,et al.  The Production of Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Graded Porosity by Sequential Freeze-Casting , 2017, Materials.

[25]  J. Lopes,et al.  Spray drying as a viable process to produce nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan (n-HAp/CS) hybrid microparticles mimicking bone composition , 2016 .

[26]  K. Pramanik,et al.  Preparation and Evaluation of Gelatin-Chitosan-Nanobioglass 3D Porous Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2016, International journal of biomaterials.

[27]  A. Ryan,et al.  Effect of different hydroxyapatite incorporation methods on the structural and biological properties of porous collagen scaffolds for bone repair , 2015, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  Xing‐dong Zhang,et al.  A spatial patternable macroporous hydrogel with cell-affinity domains to enhance cell spreading and differentiation. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[29]  Byong-Taek Lee,et al.  A combination of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogel as a new tool for bone regeneration. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[30]  K. Chennazhi,et al.  Biocompatible conducting chitosan/polypyrrole-alginate composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. , 2013, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[31]  Doan Van Hong Thien,et al.  Electrospun chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering , 2013, Journal of Materials Science.

[32]  M. Mucalo,et al.  Vacuum-assisted infiltration of chitosan or polycaprolactone as a structural reinforcement for sintered cancellous bovine bone graft. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  Aldo R. Boccaccini,et al.  Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2010, Materials.

[35]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? , 2006, Biomaterials.

[36]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  Biomaterials as Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2006, European Journal of Trauma.

[37]  S. Dasgupta,et al.  Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[38]  M. Khorasani,et al.  Incorporation of nanohydroxyapatite and vitamin D3 into electrospun PCL/Gelatin scaffolds: The influence on the physical and chemical properties and cell behavior for bone tissue engineering , 2018 .

[39]  Guoyu Yang,et al.  Synthesis, characterization and antifungal activity of coumarin-functionalized chitosan derivatives. , 2018, International journal of biological macromolecules.