The Posterior Probability of Linkage Allowing for Linkage Disequilibrium and a New Estimate of Disequilibrium between a Trait and a Marker

The posterior probability of linkage (PPL) statistic has been developed as a method for the rigorous accumulation of evidence for or against linkage allowing for both intra- and inter-sample heterogeneity. To date, the method has assumed linkage equilibrium between alleles at the trait locus and the marker locus. We now generalize the PPL to allow for linkage disequilibrium (LD), by incorporating variable phase probabilities into the underlying linkage likelihood. This enables us to recover the marginal posterior density of the recombination fraction, integrating out nuisance parameters of the trait model, including the locus heterogeneity (admixture) parameter, as well as a vector of LD parameters. The marginal posterior density can then be updated across data subsets or new data as they become available, while allowing parameters of the trait model to vary between data sets. The method applies immediately to general pedigree structures and to markers with multiple alleles. In the case of SNPs, the likelihood is parameterized in terms of the standard single LD parameter D′; and it therefore affords a mechanism for estimation of D′ between the marker and the trait, again, without fixing the parameters of the trait model and allowing for updating across data sets. It is even possible to allow for a different associated allele in different populations, while accumulating information regarding the strength of LD. While a computationally efficient implementation for multi-allelic markers is still in progress, we have implemented a version of this new LD-PPL for SNPs and evaluated its performance in nuclear families. Our simulations show that LD-PPLs tend to be larger than PPLs (stronger evidence in favor of linkage/LD) with increased LD level, under a variety of generating models; while in the absence of linkage and LD, LD-PPLs tend to be smaller than PPLs (stronger evidence against linkage). The estimate of D′ also behaves well even in relatively small, heterogeneous samples.

[1]  Veronica J Vieland,et al.  A New Method for Computing the Multipoint Posterior Probability of Linkage , 2004, Human Heredity.

[2]  Veronica J Vieland,et al.  Bayesian analysis of a previously published genome screen for panic disorder reveals new and compelling evidence for linkage to chromosome 7 , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[3]  Veronica J. Vieland,et al.  HLODs, Trait Models, and Ascertainment: Implications of Admixture for Parameter Estimation and Linkage Detection , 2002, Human Heredity.

[4]  Susan E Hodge,et al.  HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  Jian Huang,et al.  The Score Statistic of the LD-Lod Analysis: Detecting Linkage Adaptive to Linkage Disequilibrium , 2001, Human Heredity.

[6]  Jian Huang,et al.  Power to Detect Linkage Based on Multiple Sets of Data in the Presence of Locus Heterogeneity: Comparative Evaluation of Model-Based Linkage Methods for Affected Sib Pair Data , 2001, Human Heredity.

[7]  V. Vieland,et al.  Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood‐based methods , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[8]  Joseph D. Terwilliger,et al.  Gene Mapping in the 20th and 21st Centuries: Statistical Methods, Data Analysis, and Experimental Design , 2009, Human biology.

[9]  V. Vieland,et al.  The consistency of the posterior probability of linkage , 2000, Annals of human genetics.

[10]  H H Göring,et al.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  Jian Huang,et al.  Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  J. Ott,et al.  An allele of COL9A2 associated with intervertebral disc disease. , 1999, Science.

[13]  K. Do,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium analysis in Australian haemochromatosis patients indicates bipartite association with clinical expression. , 1999, Journal of hepatology.

[14]  T L Burns,et al.  Regression diagnostics for the Class A regressive model with quantitative phenotypes , 1999, Genetic epidemiology.

[15]  Jian Huang,et al.  A bayesian approach to replication of linkage findings , 1999, Genetic epidemiology.

[16]  V J Vieland,et al.  Bayesian linkage analysis, or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the posterior probability of linkage. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[17]  V. Vieland,et al.  Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm , 1998 .

[18]  S E Hodge,et al.  The problem of ascertainment for linkage analysis. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  The diastrophic dysplasia gene encodes a novel sulfate transporter: Positional cloning by fine-structure linkage disequilibrium mapping , 1994, Cell.

[20]  L. Peltonen,et al.  Refined assignment of the infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (INCL, CLN1) locus at 1p32: incorporation of linkage disequilibrium in multipoint analysis. , 1993, Genomics.

[21]  R C Elston,et al.  Man bites dog? The validity of maximizing lod scores to determine mode of inheritance. , 1989, American journal of medical genetics.

[22]  W J Ewens,et al.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. II. Generalizations and numerical results. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. , 1987, Genetics.

[24]  W J Ewens,et al.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. I. Theory. , 1986, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  P. Fain,et al.  Genetic analysis workshop II: Results of incorporating a linkage disequilibrium parameter , 1984, Genetic epidemiology.

[26]  J. Ott,et al.  Linkage analysis and family classification under heterogeneity , 1983, Annals of human genetics.

[27]  F. Clerget-Darpoux,et al.  Bias of the estimated recombination fraction and lod score due to an association between a disease gene a marker gene , 1982, Annals of human genetics.

[28]  J. Ott,et al.  A computer program for linkage analysis of general human pedigrees. , 1976, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  K Lange,et al.  The prior probability of autosomal linkage , 1975, Annals of human genetics.

[30]  R. Lewontin The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models. , 1964, Genetics.

[31]  C. A. Smith,et al.  Testing for heterogeneity of recombination fraction values in Human Genetics , 1963, Annals of human genetics.

[32]  N. Morton Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. , 1955, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  G. Dahlberg,et al.  Genetics of human populations. , 1948, Advances in genetics.