The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Communication Research

Exploratory factor analysis is a popular statistical technique used in communication research. Although exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and principal components analysis (PCA) are different techniques, PCA is often employed incorrectly to reveal latent constructs (i.e., factors) of observed variables, which is the purpose of EFA. PCA is more appropriate for reducing measured variables into a smaller set of variables (i.e., components) by keeping as much variance as possible out of the total variance in the measured variables. Furthermore, the popular use of varimax rotation raises some concerns about the relationships among the factors that researchers claim to discover. This paper discusses the distinct purposes of PCA and EFA, using two data sets as examples to highlight the differences in results between these procedures, and also reviews the use of each technique in three major communication journals: Communication Monographs, Human Communication Research, and Communication Research.

[1]  M. Browne,et al.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Number of Cases and Number of Factors: an Example Where N is Very Large , 1964 .

[3]  D. Jackson,et al.  A Comparison Of Component And Factor Patterns: A Monte Carlo Approach. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  N. Cliff,et al.  The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  W Revelle,et al.  Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors. , 1979, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  K. Widaman.  Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters? , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  R. Cranley,et al.  Multivariate Analysis—Methods and Applications , 1985 .

[8]  W F Velicer,et al.  Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  R. MacCallum,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[10]  R. Linn.  A monte carlo approach to the number of factors problem , 1968, Psychometrika.

[11]  A note on lower bounds for the number of common factors. , 1968, Psychometrika.

[12]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE USE AND ABUSE OF FACTOR ANALYSIS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1979 .

[13]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[14]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .