The Search for Complex Problem-Solving Strategies in the Presence of Stressors

Objective: The present research tests the effects of time pressure and noise on openmindedness to discover new problem-solving strategies. Background: We are primarily interested in transfer of skill from one phase to the next. More specifically, this study investigates whether the presence of stressors makes participants adhere to the sustained use of complex rules. Method: Participants learned to apply a complex rule in the first phase of a category learning task. In the second phase, this rule became dysfunctional and participants had to search for a new categorization rule in order to assign the stimuli to the correct classes. Two experiments were set up to investigate this issue. Results: Participants were found to have difficulty discovering a complex Phase 2 rule in the presence of stressors, whereas the discovery of a simple rule was not hindered by the presence of stressors. Conclusion: In the discussion, it is argued that the present results are compatible with previous research on stressors showing that time pressure and noise induce the application of simple strategies. The innovative finding here is that this simplification also occurs in individuals who are accustomed to using complex solutions. Application: The implications of the present results for emergency response training are elaborated upon.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[2]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Task Workload and Cognitive Abilities in Dynamic Decision Making , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: Effects of Time Constraints and Cognitive Abilities , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Alain Van Hiel,et al.  The Measurement of Cognitive Complexity and Its Relationship With Political Extremism , 2003 .

[5]  Alain Van Hiel,et al.  The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in western and eastern Europe. , 2003 .

[6]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Does Stress Training Generalize to Novel Settings? , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[7]  J K Ford,et al.  Emergency response training: strategies for enhancing real-world performance. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Lisa D. Ordóñez,et al.  Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time Constraint Affects Risky Decision Making , 1997 .

[9]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Emergency Decision Making in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[10]  M. F. Luce,et al.  When time is money : Decision behavior under opportunity-cost time pressure , 1996 .

[11]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[12]  E Salas,et al.  The effect of stress inoculation training on anxiety and performance. , 1996, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[13]  Bas Verplanken,et al.  Need for Cognition and External Information Search: Responses to Time Pressure during Decision-Making , 1993 .

[14]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure , 1990 .

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[16]  G. Keinan Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  H. Rothstein The effects of time pressure on judgment in multiple cue probability learning , 1986 .

[18]  H. Zur,et al.  The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior , 1981 .

[19]  P. Rabbit Human information processing , 1977, Nature.

[20]  Peter Wright The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. , 1974 .

[21]  G. R. J. Hockey Effect of Loud Noise on Attentional Selectivity , 1970 .

[22]  W. A. Scott Cognitive Complexity and Cognitive Flexibility , 1962 .

[23]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[24]  C. D. Smock,et al.  The influence of psychological stress on the "intolerance of ambiguity". , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  A. Luchins,et al.  On recent usage of the Einstellung-effect as a test of rigidity. , 1951, Journal of consulting psychology.

[26]  A. Luchins Rigidity and ethnocentrism; a critique. , 1949, Journal of personality.

[27]  Jacob D. Dodson The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation in the kitten. , 1915 .

[28]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[29]  R. Christie Some Experimental Approaches to Authoritarianism: I. A Retrospective Perspective on the Einstellung (Rigidity?) Paradigm , 1993 .

[30]  Hillel J. Einhorn,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making , 1982 .

[31]  K. Goldstein,et al.  Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research , 1978 .

[32]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[33]  P. H. Lindsay Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[34]  S. Bacon,et al.  Arousal and the range of cue utilization. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  J. Bieri Cognitive Complexity and Personality Development , 1966 .

[36]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .