Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6

Abstract. Human land use activities have resulted in large changes to the biogeochemical and biophysical properties of the Earth's surface, with consequences for climate and other ecosystem services. In the future, land use activities are likely to expand and/or intensify further to meet growing demands for food, fiber, and energy. As part of the World Climate Research Program Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), the international community has developed the next generation of advanced Earth system models (ESMs) to estimate the combined effects of human activities (e.g., land use and fossil fuel emissions) on the carbon–climate system. A new set of historical data based on the History of the Global Environment database (HYDE), and multiple alternative scenarios of the future (2015–2100) from Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) teams, is required as input for these models. With most ESM simulations for CMIP6 now completed, it is important to document the land use patterns used by those simulations. Here we present results from the Land-Use Harmonization 2 (LUH2) project, which smoothly connects updated historical reconstructions of land use with eight new future projections in the format required for ESMs. The harmonization strategy estimates the fractional land use patterns, underlying land use transitions, key agricultural management information, and resulting secondary lands annually, while minimizing the differences between the end of the historical reconstruction and IAM initial conditions and preserving changes depicted by the IAMs in the future. The new approach builds on a similar effort from CMIP5 and is now provided at higher resolution (0.25∘×0.25∘) over a longer time domain (850–2100, with extensions to 2300) with more detail (including multiple crop and pasture types and associated management practices) using more input datasets (including Landsat remote sensing data) and updated algorithms (wood harvest and shifting cultivation); it is assessed via a new diagnostic package. The new LUH2 products contain > 50 times the information content of the datasets used in CMIP5 and are designed to enable new and improved estimates of the combined effects of land use on the global carbon–climate system.

[1]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2 , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[2]  P. Kyle,et al.  Key determinants of global land-use projections , 2019, Nature communications.

[3]  Shicheng Li,et al.  Evaluation of global historical land use scenarios based on regional datasets on the Qinghai-Tibet Area. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Walter Jetz,et al.  A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios , 2018, bioRxiv.

[5]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[6]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Historical Land Cover Conversion Uncertainty on Global Carbon and Climate Estimates , 2018 .

[7]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  Constraining the deforestation history of Europe: Evaluation of historical land use scenarios with pollen-based land cover reconstructions , 2017 .

[8]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics , 2017 .

[9]  Matthew Hansen,et al.  A global view of shifting cultivation: Recent, current, and future extent , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Biospheric feedback effects in a synchronously coupled model of human and Earth systems , 2017 .

[11]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Current challenges of implementing anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change in models contributing to climate change assessments , 2017 .

[12]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Global land-use allocation model linked to an integrated assessment model. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Historical carbon dioxide emissions caused by land-use changes are possibly larger than assumed , 2017 .

[14]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2 , 2016 .

[15]  Eduardo Zorita,et al.  The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 3: the Last Millennium, Scientific Objective and Experimental Design for the PMIP4 past1000 simulations , 2016 .

[16]  Tyler D. Eddy,et al.  Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b) , 2016 .

[17]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[18]  P. Patel,et al.  Downscaling land use and land cover from the Global Change Assessment Modelfor coupling with Earth system models , 2016 .

[19]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6:rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[20]  Arief Wijaya,et al.  An integrated pan‐tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets , 2016, Global change biology.

[21]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal , 2016 .

[22]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Conservation policy and the measurement of forests , 2016 .

[23]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[24]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2015 , 2015 .

[25]  E. Davidson,et al.  Managing nitrogen for sustainable development , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Qiongyu Huang,et al.  Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land‐use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate‐change mitigation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  The integrated Earth system model version 1: formulation and functionality , 2015 .

[28]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[29]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Land-use protection for climate change mitigation , 2014 .

[30]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  From land use to land cover: restoring the afforestation signal in a coupled integrated assessment–earth system model and the implications for CMIP5 RCP simulations , 2014 .

[31]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Identifying representative crop rotation patterns and grassland loss in the US Western Corn Belt , 2014 .

[32]  Kiyoshi Takahashi,et al.  Land use representation in a global CGE model for long-term simulation: CET vs. logit functions , 2014, Food Security.

[33]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[34]  James A. Edmonds,et al.  ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL MODELING OF LAND USE IN GCAM 3.0 AND AN APPLICATION TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, LAND, AND TERRESTRIAL CARBON , 2014 .

[35]  Allison M. Thomson,et al.  Downscaling global land cover projections from an integrated assessment model for use in regional analyses: results and evaluation for the US from 2005 to 2095 , 2014 .

[36]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase , 2014 .

[37]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of the World's Forests , 2013 .

[38]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2016 , 2016 .

[39]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[40]  Robert B. Cook,et al.  The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data , 2013 .

[41]  Elena Shevliakova,et al.  Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Effect of Anthropogenic Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Climate and Land Carbon Storage in CMIP5 Projections for the Twenty-First Century , 2013 .

[43]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Policy Influences Climate via Direct Effects of Land-Use Change , 2013 .

[44]  V. Smil,et al.  Energy crossroads , 2013, Nature.

[45]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  N 2 O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle – current state and future scenarios , 2012 .

[46]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[47]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[48]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands , 2011 .

[49]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[50]  J. Lamarque,et al.  The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations , 2011 .

[51]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .

[52]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink , 2009 .

[54]  C. Müller,et al.  Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: a spatially explicit mathematical programming approach. , 2008 .

[55]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium , 2008 .

[56]  Thomas Hickler,et al.  Effects of human land-use on the global carbon cycle during the last 6,000 years , 2008 .

[57]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000 , 2008 .

[59]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[60]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[61]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[62]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices , 2006, Carbon balance and management.

[63]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[64]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties , 2005 .

[65]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[66]  S. Sterling,et al.  Human Appropriation of Photosynthesis Products , 2001, Science.

[67]  S. Pacala,et al.  Projecting the future of the U.S. carbon sink , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[69]  K. K. Goldewijk Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE Database , 2001 .

[70]  V. Smil Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production , 2000 .

[71]  Michael T. Coe,et al.  Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure , 2000 .

[72]  T. Brooks,et al.  Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[73]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. 1: The roles of agriculture and forestry. , 2000 .

[74]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[75]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results , 1999 .

[76]  G. Hurtt,et al.  Terrestrial models and global change: challenges for the future , 1998 .

[77]  Joseph H. Butler,et al.  Economic geography: Spatial and environmental aspects of economic activity , 1982 .

[78]  H. Ruthenberg Farming systems in the tropics , 1973 .

[79]  Raphael Zon,et al.  Forest Resources of the World. , 1911 .

[80]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation , 2018 .

[81]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[82]  M. Kainuma,et al.  SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[83]  M. Strubegger,et al.  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[84]  C. Müller,et al.  Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm , 2017 .

[85]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[86]  K. Calvin,et al.  Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[87]  P. Kyle,et al.  The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality , 2017 .

[88]  C. Müller,et al.  Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling , 2014 .

[89]  Mykola Gusti,et al.  An algorithm for simulation of forest management decisions in the global forest model , 2010 .

[90]  J. S. Cole Crop Rotation , 1944, Nature.