Using the Wiener-Levinson algorithm to suppress ground-roll

Abstract In land seismic surveys, the seismic data are mostly contaminated by ground-roll noise, high amplitude and low frequency. Since the ground-roll is coherent with reflections and depends on the source, the spectral band of seismic signal and ground-roll always overlap, which can be clearly seen in the spectral domain. So, separating them in time or frequency domain commonly causes waveform distortions and information missing due to cut-off effects. Therefore, the combination of these factors leads to search for alternative filtering methods or processes. We applied the conventional Wiener–Levinson algorithm to extract ground-roll from the seismic data. Then, subtracting it from the seismic data arithmetically performs the ground-roll suppression. To set up the algorithm, linear or nonlinear sweep signals are used as reference noise trace. The frequencies needed in creating a reference noise trace using analytical sweep signal can be approximately estimated in spectral domain. The application of the proposed method based on redesigning of Wiener–Levinson algorithm differs from the usual frequency filtering techniques since the ground-roll is suppressed without cutting signal spectrum. The method is firstly tested on synthetics and then is applied to a shot data from the field. The result obtained from both synthetics and field data show that the ground-roll suppression in this way causes no waveform distortion and no reduction of frequency bandwidth of the data.

[1]  Pierre L. Goupillaud,et al.  SIGNAL DESIGN IN THE "VIBROSEIS"@ TECHNIQUE , 1976 .

[2]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[3]  J. Klauder,et al.  The theory and design of chirp radars , 1960 .

[4]  Doyle R. Watts,et al.  Ground-roll suppression using the wavelet transform , 1997 .

[5]  Ruhi Saatçılar,et al.  A method of ground-roll elimination , 1988 .

[6]  John K. Costain,et al.  Noise attenuation by vibroseis whitening (VSW) processing , 1983 .

[7]  Mark Holzman CHEBYSHEV OPTIMIZED GEOPHONE ARRAYS , 1963 .

[8]  Ruhi Saatçılar,et al.  The lattice filter in ground-roll suppression , 1994 .

[9]  Burkhard Buttkus,et al.  Spectral Analysis and Filter Theory in Applied Geophysics , 2000 .

[10]  A. E. McKay Review of pattern shooting , 1954 .

[11]  A. Frank Linville,et al.  CANCELING STATIONARY SINUSOIDAL NOISE , 1992 .

[12]  J. L. Hock,et al.  An exact recursion for the composite nearest‐neighbor degeneracy for a 2×N lattice space , 1984 .

[13]  N. Levinson The Wiener (Root Mean Square) Error Criterion in Filter Design and Prediction , 1946 .

[14]  J. P. Fail,et al.  LES FILTRES EN EVENTAIL , 1963 .

[15]  Milo M. Backus,et al.  WIDE‐BAND VELOCITY FILTERING—THE PIE‐SLICE PROCESS , 1963 .

[16]  R. Wiggins,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTIMUM MULTICHANNEL STACKING FILTERS , 1968 .

[17]  S. Treitel,et al.  Some aspects of fan filtering , 1967 .

[18]  Xuewei Liu,et al.  Ground roll supression using the Karhunen‐Loeve transform , 1999 .

[19]  Sven Treitel,et al.  Geophysical Signal Analysis , 2000 .

[20]  H. Blinchikoff,et al.  Filtering in the time and frequency domains , 1976 .

[21]  G. A. McMechan,et al.  Depth filtering of first breaks and ground roll , 1991 .