Choosing Indicators of Natural Resource Condition: A Case Study in Arches National Park, Utah, USA

/ Heavy visitor use in many areas of the world have necessitated development of ways to assess visitation impacts. Arches National Park recently completed a Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) plan. Integral to this plan was developing a method to identify biological indicators that would both measure visitor impacts and response to management actions. The process used in Arches for indicator selection is outlined here as a model applicableto many areas facing similar challenges. The steps were: (1) Vegetation types most used by visitors were identified. Impacted and unimpacted areas in these types were sampled, comparing vegetation and soil factors. (2) Variables found to differ significantly between compared sites were used as potential indicators. (3) Site-specific criteria for indicators were developed, and potential indicators evaluated using these criteria. (4) Chosen indicators were further researched for ecological relevancy. (5) Final indicators were chosen, field tested, and monitoring sites designated. In Arches, indicators were chosen for monitoring annually (soil crust index, soil compaction, number of used social trails and soil aggregate stability) and every five years (vegetation cover and frequency; ground cover; soil chemistry; and plant tissue chemistry).KEY WORDS: Biological indicators; Recreation impacts; Recreation management; Desert soils; Trampling

[1]  Jeffrey L. Marion,et al.  Capabilities and management utility of recreation impact monitoring programs , 1995 .

[2]  D. A. Gillette,et al.  MICROPHYTIC CRUST INFLUENCE ON WIND EROSION , 1995 .

[3]  D. Parsons,et al.  Measuring impacts of wilderness use. , 1980 .

[4]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  Surface disturbances: Their role in accelerating desertification , 1995, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  Recovery rates of cryptobiotic crusts: inoculant use and assessment methods , 1993 .

[6]  J. Belnap,et al.  MICROENVIRONMENTS AND MICROSCALE PRODUCTIVITY OF CYANOBACTERIAL DESERT CRUSTS 1 , 1996 .

[7]  David N. Cole,et al.  The Limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning , 1985 .

[8]  Cheryl McKenna Neuman,et al.  Wind transport of sand surfaces crusted with photoautotrophic microorganisms , 1996 .

[9]  D. Cole.  Wilderness campsite impacts: Effect of amount of use , 1982 .

[10]  Alan R. Graefe,et al.  Visitor Impact Management: The Planning Framework , 1990 .

[11]  J. Vaske,et al.  Visitor impact management : a review of research , 1990 .

[12]  R. J. Beymer,et al.  Potential contribution of carbon by microphytic crusts in pinyon‐juniper woodlands , 1991 .

[13]  J. Belnap,et al.  Influence of cryptobiotic soil crusts on elemental content of tissue of two desert seed plants , 1995 .

[14]  Jayne Belnap,et al.  DISTURBANCE OF BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS: IMPACTS ON POTENTIAL WIND ERODIBILITY OF SANDY DESERT SOILS IN SOUTHEASTERN UTAH , 1997 .