Statistics of Absolute and Relative Dispersion in the Atmospheric Convective Boundary Layer: A Large-Eddy Simulation Study

The influence of the different scales of turbulent motion on plume dispersion in the atmospheric convective boundary layer (CBL) is studied by means of a large-eddy simulation (LES). In particular, the large-scale (meandering) and small-scale (relative diffusion) contributions are separated by analyzing dispersion in two reference systems: the absolute (fixed) coordinate system and the coordinate system relative to the plume’s instantaneous center of mass. In the relative coordinate system, the (vertically) inhomogeneous meandering motion is removed, and only the small-scale, homogeneous turbulent motion contributes to the dispersion process. First, mean plume position, dispersion parameters (variance), and skewness of the plume position are discussed. The analysis of the third-order moments shows how the structure and the symmetry of scalar distribution are affected with respect to the turbulent characteristics of the CBL (inhomogeneity of the large-scale vertical motion) and the presence of the boundary conditions (surface and top of the CBL). In fact, the reflection of the plume by the CBL boundaries generates the presence of nonlinear crosscorrelation terms in the balance equation for the third-order moments of the plume position. As a result, the third-order moment of the absolute position is not balanced by the sum of the third-order moments of the meandering and relative plume position. Second, mean concentration and concentration fluctuations are calculated and discussed in both coordinate systems. The intensity of relative concentration fluctuation icr, which quantifies the internal (in plume) mixing, is explicitly calculated. Based on these results, a parameterization for the probability distribution function (PDF) of the relative concentration is proposed, showing very good agreement with the LES results. Finally, the validity of Gifford’s formula, which relates the absolute concentration’s high-order moments to the relative concentration and the PDF of the plume centerline, is studied. It is found that due to the presence of the CBL boundaries, Gifford’s formula is not able to reproduce correctly the value of the absolute mean concentration near the ground. This result is analyzed by showing that, when the plume is reflected by the CBL boundaries, the instantaneous relative plume width z 2 r (t) departs from its mean value 2 r. By introducing the skewness of the relative plume position into a parameterization for the relative mean concentration, the results for the calculated mean concentration are improved.

[1]  M. Hibberd.  Vertical dispersion of a passive scalar in the convective boundary layer: new laboratory results , 2000 .

[2]  Peter J. Hurley,et al.  Comparison of closure schemes used to specify the velocity PDF in Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models for convective conditions , 1996 .

[3]  Michael S. Borgas,et al.  A skewed meandering plume model for concentration statistics in the convective boundary layer , 2000 .

[4]  E. Yee,et al.  Incorporation of internal fluctuations in a meandering plume model of concentration fluctuations , 1994 .

[5]  P. Chatwin,et al.  Some Simple Statistical Models For Relative And Absolute Dispersion , 2003 .

[6]  F. Gifford,et al.  Statistical Properties of a Fluctuating Plume Dispersion Model , 1959 .

[7]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Representation of internal plume structure in Gifford's meandering plume model , 2000 .

[8]  S. Hanna.  Ground-level concentration fluctuations from a buoyant and a non-buoyant source within a laboratory convectively mixed layer , 1985 .

[9]  D. S. Henn,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of concentration fluctuations in a dispersing plume , 1992 .

[10]  P. Duynkerke,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Trade Wind Cumulus Clouds. , 1993 .

[11]  Spectra of concentration fluctuations: The two time scales of a meandering plume , 1986 .

[12]  Eugene Yee,et al.  A Comparison Of The Detailed Structure In Dispersing Tracer Plumes Measured In Grid-Generated Turbulence With A Meandering Plume Model Incorporating Internal Fluctuations , 2000 .

[13]  Ground-level concentrations due to fumigation into an entraining mixed layer , 1982 .

[14]  F. T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  A large eddy simulation of buoyant and non-buoyant plume dispersion in the atmospheric boundary layer , 1987 .

[15]  J. Deardorff,et al.  Groundlevel concentration fluctuations from a buoyant and a non-buoyant source within a laboratory convectively mixed layer , 1984 .

[16]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Evaluation of Parametric Assumptions for Shallow Cumulus Convection , 1995 .

[17]  J. Deardorff,et al.  A laboratory study of dispersion from an elevated source within a modeled convective planetary boundary layer , 1978 .

[18]  F. Nieuwstadt,et al.  A large-eddy simulation of a line source in a convective atmospheric boundary layer—I. Dispersion characteristics , 1992 .

[19]  P. Chatwin,et al.  A Concentration pdf for the Relative Dispersion of a Contaminant Plume in the Atmosphere , 2003 .

[20]  F. Nieuwstadt,et al.  A large-eddy simulation of a line source in a convective atmospheric boundary layer—II. Dynamics of a buoyant line source , 1992 .

[21]  R. Sykes,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of dispersion in the convective boundary layer , 1992 .

[22]  P. Franzese.  Lagrangian stochastic modeling of a fluctuating plume in the convective boundary layer , 2003 .

[23]  J. Deardorff,et al.  A laboratory study of dispersion from a source in the middle of the convectively mixed layer , 1981 .

[24]  A. Robins,et al.  Concentration fluctuations and fluxes in plumes from point sources in a turbulent boundary layer , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer , 1986 .

[26]  R. E. Lawson,et al.  Experiments On Buoyant Plume Dispersion In A Laboratory Convection Tank , 2002 .