Buzz Factor or Innovation Potential: What Explains Cryptocurrencies’ Returns?

Cryptocurrencies have become increasingly popular since the introduction of bitcoin in 2009. In this paper, we identify factors associated with variations in cryptocurrencies’ market values. In the past, researchers argued that the “buzz” surrounding cryptocurrencies in online media explained their price variations. But this observation obfuscates the notion that cryptocurrencies, unlike fiat currencies, are technologies entailing a true innovation potential. By using, for the first time, a unique measure of innovation potential, we find that the latter is in fact the most important factor associated with increases in cryptocurrency returns. By contrast, we find that the buzz surrounding cryptocurrencies is negatively associated with returns after controlling for a variety of factors, such as supply growth and liquidity. Also interesting is our finding that a cryptocurrency’s association with fraudulent activity is not negatively associated with weekly returns—a result that further qualifies the media’s influence on cryptocurrencies. Finally, we find that an increase in supply is positively associated with weekly returns. Taken together, our findings show that cryptocurrencies do not behave like traditional currencies or commodities—unlike what most prior research has assumed—and depict an industry that is much more mature, and much less speculative, than has been implied by previous accounts.

[1]  Donald W. Marquaridt Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation , 1970 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  Categorical Anarchy in the U.K.? The British Media's Classification of Bitcoin and the Limits of Categorization , 2016 .

[3]  Correction: Do the Rich Get Richer? An Empirical Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Network , 2014, PLoS ONE.

[4]  Arnaud Bervas Market liquidity and its incorporation into risk management , 2006 .

[5]  B. Ohlin,et al.  Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest: Three Rejoinders , 1937 .

[6]  G. Selgin Synthetic Commodity Money , 2013 .

[7]  Ole Bjerg How is Bitcoin Money? , 2016 .

[8]  Russell P. Robins,et al.  Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The Arch-M Model , 1987 .

[9]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering , 2011 .

[10]  Kai Zimmermann,et al.  Bitcoin - Asset or Currency? Revealing Users' Hidden Intentions , 2014, ECIS.

[11]  P. Ciaian,et al.  The economics of BitCoin price formation , 2014, 1405.4498.

[12]  L. Martellini,et al.  Passive Hedge Fund Replication – Beyond the Linear Case , 2010 .

[13]  Andrew J. Patton,et al.  Monotonicity in asset returns: New tests with applications to the term structure, the CAPM, and portfolio sorts , 2010 .

[14]  Qing Bai,et al.  The Impacts of Social Media on Bitcoin Performance , 2016, ICIS.

[15]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[16]  Andrew Hencic,et al.  Noncausal Autoregressive Model in Application to Bitcoin/USD Exchange Rates , 2015, Econometrics of Risk.

[17]  Guo Li,et al.  Evaluating the Potential of Alternative Cryptocurrencies , 2015 .

[18]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[19]  Pavlin Mavrodiev,et al.  The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Matthew Kien-Meng Ly Coining Bitcoin's "Legal-Bits": Examining the Regulatory Framework for Bitcoin and Virtual Currencies , 2014 .

[21]  Mody,et al.  Bitcoin and Blockchain : A peer to peer electronic cash system , 2018 .

[22]  Jialin Yu,et al.  High Frequency Market Microstructure Noise Estimates and Liquidity Measures , 2008, 0906.1444.

[23]  Reuben Grinberg Bitcoin: An Innovative Alternative Digital Currency , 2011 .

[24]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[25]  István Csabai,et al.  Do the Rich Get Richer? An Empirical Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Network , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[27]  H. Stanley,et al.  Cross-correlations between volume change and price change , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Hanna Halaburda,et al.  Beyond Bitcoin: The Economics of Digital Currencies , 2015 .

[29]  Ladislav Kristoufek,et al.  What Are the Main Drivers of the Bitcoin Price? Evidence from Wavelet Coherence Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[31]  C. Granger,et al.  Spurious regressions in econometrics , 1974 .

[32]  A. Cheung,et al.  Crypto-currency bubbles: an application of the Phillips–Shi–Yu (2013) methodology on Mt. Gox bitcoin prices , 2015 .

[33]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  Data from: Buzz factor or innovation potential: what explains cryptocurrencies' returns? , 2017 .

[34]  H. G. Brown,et al.  The Purchasing Power Of Money , 1911 .

[35]  S. Nadarajah,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Exchange Rate of Bitcoin , 2015, PloS one.

[36]  Thomas S. Kim The Predecessors of Bitcoin and Their Implications for the Prospect of Virtual Currencies , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  Martin D. Smith,et al.  The Fishery Performance Indicators: A Management Tool for Triple Bottom Line Outcomes , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Angelika I. Kokkinaki,et al.  Bitcoin Is Volatile! Isn't that Right? , 2014, BIS.

[39]  L. Randall Wray Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest , 1992 .

[40]  Ladislav Kristoufek,et al.  BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[41]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .