Intercity Variations in the Relationship between Urban form and Automobile Dependence

This study was motivated by the need for more empirical research on the urban form–travel connection. A two-tiered travel effect is expected from strengthening the urban form–travel connection: the enhancement of access to choices and a shift in travel mode choice from driving to nondriving. Existing studies have focused primarily on the second-tier effect but have largely omitted the first. This study attempted to fill that gap. Through joint-logit modeling of choice set formation and travel mode choice in three cities–-Boston, Massachusetts; Portland, Oregon; and Houston, Texas–-the study measured the degree of automobile dependence in the three cities. It also estimated elasticities of automobile dependence and of driving probabilities with respect to land use densi-fication, transit access improvement, and control of motorization. There were large variations in the levels of automobile dependence and their elasticity estimates among the three cities. Public policies aimed at reducing automobile dependence should be formulated and evaluated based not just on the final outcome of modal split but also on the provision of travel options to travelers. As cities differ in their existing urban forms, currently available transportation services, and prevailing preferences of travel, it is important to recognize that the same set of policy strategies implemented in different cities is unlikely to generate the same level of effects in reducing automobile dependence.

[1]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[2]  J. Kenworthy,et al.  Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy , 1999 .

[3]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Automobile Dependence in Bangkok: An International Comparison with Implications for Planning Policies , 1995 .

[4]  Todd Litman,et al.  THE COSTS OF AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCY AND THE BENEFITS OF BALANCED TRANSPORTATION , 1995 .

[5]  John F. Kain,et al.  Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers , 1999 .

[6]  Glenn. Lyons,et al.  A case study of the development of car dependence in teenagers , 1998 .

[7]  S. Handy Understanding the Link Between Urban Form and Nonwork Travel Behavior , 1995 .

[8]  R E Brindle LIES, DAMNED LIES AND 'AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE' - SOME HYPERBOLIC REFLECTIONS , 1994 .

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman Modeling traffic's flow-density relation: Accommodation of multiple flow regimes and traveler types , 2001 .

[10]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[11]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  An Endogenous Segmentation Mode Choice Model with an Application to Intercity Travel , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[12]  R. Crane,et al.  DOES NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN INFLUENCE TRAVEL?: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL DIARY AND GIS DATA , 1998 .

[13]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  GASOLINE CONSUMPTION AND CITIES: A REPLY , 1989 .

[14]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Car dependence in a public transport dominated city: evidence from Hong Kong , 2003 .

[15]  Phil. Goodwin,et al.  Mobility and Car Dependence , 1997 .

[16]  R. Cervero,et al.  Transit villages for the 21st century , 1996 .

[17]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[18]  P. Newman,et al.  CITIES AND AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE: AN INTERNATIONAL SOURCEBOOK , 1989 .

[19]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[20]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[21]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models , 2001 .

[22]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Effect of Free Parking on Commuter Mode Choice: Evidence from Travel Diary Data , 2001 .

[23]  Ming Zhang The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong , 2004 .

[24]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[25]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .

[26]  Stephen Gordon,et al.  EFFECT OF NEOTRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ON TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS , 1994 .

[27]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice models with latent choice sets , 1995 .

[28]  J. Horowitz,et al.  What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling , 1995 .

[29]  安川 文明,et al.  予防歯科プログラムの選考に関する Discrete Choice Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  EMPIRICAL TEST OF A CONSTRAINED CHOICE DISCRETE MODEL : MODE CHOICE IN SAO PAULO, BRAZIL , 1987 .

[31]  P. Katz The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community , 1993 .

[32]  Reid Ewing,et al.  GETTING AROUND A TRADITIONAL CITY, A SUBURBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD), AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN , 1994 .