COA Modeling with Probabilistic Ontologies

Planning during complex endeavors is a daunting task in many aspects. An important one is the representation of shared intent, which is an open research topic focused on expressing a common picture among different planning systems with distinct languages, and sometimes disparate problem solving methodologies. The common approach is to use a translator between the order/request message and the planning system, which doesn’t convey all the elements that are necessary to support the planning task. The present research proposes to address this issue by the use of a semantic layer as an interface among different planning systems, which not only improves interoperability but also provides support for pruning the search space before the information is sent to the planning system. The layer is based on a probabilistic ontology, which provides shared intent description as well as formalization of the operational domain and of the planning problem, including a principled representation of the involved uncertainty. The proposed scheme supports previous analysis of the search space in order to send to the planning system a concise set of tasks that will contribute to reach the desired end state. Keywords—Interoperability, Automated Planning, Probabilistic Ontology.

[1]  Benjamin J. Cowen Designing a Distributed Space Systems Simulation in Accordance with the Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) , 2011 .

[2]  Stefan Edelkamp,et al.  Automated Planning: Theory and Practice , 2007, Künstliche Intell..

[3]  Dana J. Johnson,et al.  Command and Control of Joint Air Operations , 1991 .

[4]  Ricardo de Almeida Falbo,et al.  Models for Representing Task Ontologies , 2008, WONTO.

[5]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - US Contribution to the C-BML PDG , 2007 .

[6]  T. Clark Organisational Interoperability Maturity Model for C 2 , 1999 .

[7]  I-Ching Hsu,et al.  Semantic-based Military Scenario Generation for Mission Planning , 2011 .

[8]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Bayesian semantics for the semantic web , 2005 .

[9]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  The Ontology of Tasks and Methods , 1997 .

[10]  Craig A. Knoblock,et al.  PDDL-the planning domain definition language , 1998 .

[11]  R. Goldman Ontologies and Planners A Statement of Interest , 2004 .

[12]  Ulrich Schade,et al.  Adding reports to coalition battle management language for NATO MSG-048 , 2009 .

[13]  Zhongfei Zhang,et al.  Determining Course of Action Alignment with Operational Objectives , 2006 .

[14]  Leslie S. Winters,et al.  Next Generation Data Interoperability: It's all About the Metadata , 2008 .

[15]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Taxonomies, Ontologies, Battle Management Languages - Recommendations for the Coalition BML Study Group , 2005 .

[16]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Probabilistic ontology: representation and modeling methodology , 2011 .

[17]  William McKeever,et al.  Scenario Generation to Support Mission Planning , 2006 .

[18]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model , 2003 .

[19]  Edward Allen Smith Effects Based Operations: Applying Network Centric Warfare in Peace, Crisis, and War , 2002 .

[20]  Albert Frantz,et al.  A Semantic Web Application for the Air Tasking Order (ATO) (Briefing Charts) , 2005 .

[21]  Christopher Egan,et al.  Course of Action Scoring and Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Intelligent planning - a decomposition and abstraction based approach , 1997, Artificial intelligence.