Assessing the Impact of Historical Story Telling on Student Learning of Natural Selection

[1]  J. O’Neill,et al.  Invisible Learnings?: A Commentary on John Hattie's Book - 'Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-analyses Relating to Achievement' , 2009 .

[2]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[3]  S. Klassen,et al.  The Relation of Story Structure to a Model of Conceptual Change in Science Learning , 2010 .

[4]  Ron Good,et al.  Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison , 1995 .

[5]  E. Margaret Evans,et al.  Conceptual Change and Evolutionary Biology: A Developmental Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science , 2005 .

[7]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  Can the history of science help science educators anticipate students' misconceptions? , 1986 .

[8]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Changes in Students' Understanding of Evolution Resulting from Different Curricular and Instructional Strategies. , 1996 .

[9]  F. Kubli.  Can the Theory of Narratives Help Science Teachers be Better Storytellers , 2001 .

[10]  J. Conant,et al.  On understanding science; an historical approach. , 1947, American scientist.

[11]  Kostas Kampourakis,et al.  Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations , 2008 .

[12]  A. Stinner,et al.  The Renewal of Case Studies in Science Education , 2003 .

[13]  D. Rudge,et al.  Changes Observed in Views of Nature of Science During a Historically Based Unit , 2014 .

[14]  M. Scoble.  The Aurelian Legacy – British Butterflies and their Collectors , 2001 .

[15]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  The Other Half of the Story: Effect Size Analysis in Quantitative Research , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  What Makes a Good Case , 1998 .

[17]  D. Rudge.  Does being wrong make Kettlewell wrong for science teaching? , 2000 .

[18]  D. Rudge,et al.  The Portrayal of Industrial Melanism in American College General Biology Textbooks , 2016, Science & Education.

[19]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[20]  V. Lim,et al.  Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: an ERP study , 2009 .

[21]  R. Gadagkar.  Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution , 2005 .

[22]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A typology of mixed methods research designs , 2009 .

[23]  D. Anderson,et al.  The Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection a decade later: Development and pilot testing of a middle school version leads to a revised college/high school version , 2013 .

[24]  James Blachowicz.  How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher's Perspective , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[25]  L. Giddings.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[26]  M. Majerus,et al.  Industrial Melanism in the Peppered Moth, Biston betularia: An Excellent Teaching Example of Darwinian Evolution in Action , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[27]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[28]  M. Majerus.  Melanism: Evolution in Action , 1998 .

[29]  Judy Perry,et al.  Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[30]  S. Klassen,et al.  The Construction and Analysis of a Science Story: A Proposed Methodology , 2009 .

[31]  A. Irwin,et al.  Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context , 2000 .

[32]  Kostas Kampourakis,et al.  Preliminary Evolutionary Explanations: A Basic Framework for Conceptual Change and Explanatory Coherence in Evolution , 2009 .

[33]  L. Barrow,et al.  The Treatment of Geological Time & the History of Life on Earth in High School Biology Textbooks , 2007 .

[34]  W. Sedgwick,et al.  THE TEACHING OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE. , 1915, Science.

[35]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[36]  L. Cook,et al.  Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus , 2012, Biology Letters.

[37]  R. Duschl.  Science Education and Philosophy of Science Twenty‐Five Years of Mutually Exclusive Development , 1985 .

[38]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[39]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View , 1998 .

[40]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science , 2000 .

[41]  R. Driver,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science , 1986 .

[42]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Beyond 2000: science/biology education for the future , 1999 .

[43]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  PLACING THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ON THE CURRICULUM : A MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGY , 1997 .

[44]  S. Norris.  Scientific Myth-Conceptions , 2003 .

[45]  D. Rudge,et al.  An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science , 2009 .

[46]  A. Arons.  Historical and philosphical perspectives attainable in introductory physics courses , 1988 .

[47]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Translating the Statistical Representation of the Effects of Education Interventions Into More Readily Interpretable Forms , 2012 .

[48]  History in Science Education , with Cautionary Tales about the Agreement of Measurement and Theory ∗ , 2002 .

[49]  J. Wandersee,et al.  Interactive Historical Vignettes , 2005 .

[50]  S. Gould.  The Structure of Evolutionary Theory , 2002 .

[51]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[52]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[53]  E. Wilson.  The Power of Story: , 2019, A Path Twice Traveled.

[54]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[55]  R. Nehm,et al.  Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection , 2007 .

[56]  W. H. Kane.  On Cause and Effect in Biology. , 1962, Science.

[57]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[58]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[59]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[60]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[61]  Stephen M. Ritchie,et al.  Writing an Ecological Mystery in Class: Merging genres and learning science , 2008 .

[62]  P. Kitcher.  Darwin's Achievement , 1995 .

[63]  Carol E. Cleland.  Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science* , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[64]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[65]  I. Arnold,et al.  John Hattie: Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement , 2011 .

[66]  Barbara Herrnstein Smith,et al.  Narrative Versions, Narrative Theories , 1980, Critical Inquiry.

[67]  W. McComas,et al.  Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science , 2008 .

[68]  Cleo H. Cherryholmes.  Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism , 1992 .

[69]  John B. Black,et al.  Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives , 1981 .

[70]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy , 1995 .

[71]  M. Feilzer,et al.  Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm: , 2010 .

[72]  David Topper,et al.  The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change , 1979 .

[73]  N. Rescher.  Reason and Rationality in Natural Science: A Group of Essays , 1985 .

[74]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  J. Mandler,et al.  On the psychological validity of story structure , 1982 .

[76]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Time-Course of Constructing Knowledge-Based Inferences for Scientific Texts , 1994 .

[77]  K. E. Irving,et al.  History of Science as an Instructional Context: Student Learning in Genetics and Nature of Science , 2010 .

[78]  Mike U. Smith.  Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues , 2010 .

[79]  J. Wandersee.  The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research , 1992 .

[80]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[81]  M. R. Matthews.  How Pendulum Studies Can Promote Knowledge of the Nature of Science , 2001 .

[82]  Michael P. Clough,et al.  Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives , 2007 .

[83]  Ross H. Nehm,et al.  Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open‐response instrument, and an oral interview , 2008 .

[84]  Michael P. Clough.  The Story Behind the Science: Bringing Science and Scientists to Life in Post-Secondary Science Education , 2011 .

[85]  Kieran Egan,et al.  Teaching as Story Telling: An Alternative Approach to Teaching and Curriculum in the Elementary School , 1989 .

[86]  N. Toth,et al.  Making Silent Stones Speak: Human Evolution And The Dawn Of Technology , 1993 .

[87]  R. Sudweeks,et al.  USING ITEM RESPONSE THEORY TO CONDUCT A DISTRACTER ANALYSIS ON CONCEPTUAL INVENTORY OF NATURAL SELECTION , 2010 .

[88]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Effect Size Substantive Interpretation Guidelines : Issues in the Interpretation of Effect Sizes , 2007 .

[89]  J. Conant.  For the Understanding of Science , 1947, Nature.

[90]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[91]  J. Lennox.  Darwin was a teleologist , 1993 .

[92]  M. Majerus,et al.  The peppered moth: decline of a Darwinian disciple. , 2005 .

[93]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[94]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[95]  Robert L. Shrigley,et al.  Anecdotes: What Research Suggests about Their Use in the Science Classroom , 1989 .

[96]  Ben Jeffares.  Testing times: regularities in the historical sciences. , 2008, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[97]  C. Teddlie,et al.  Foundations of mixed methods research , 2013 .

[98]  U. Kattmann,et al.  Teaching Evolution with Historical Narratives , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[99]  Joel K. Abraham,et al.  Short Lesson Plan Associated with Increased Acceptance of Evolutionary Theory and Potential Change in Three Alternate Conceptions of Macroevolution in Undergraduate Students , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[100]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[101]  Loyal Jones,et al.  Remembering , 1975, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[102]  Manfred Max Bergman,et al.  7 Quality of Inferences in Mixed Methods Research: Calling for an Integrative Framework , 2008 .

[103]  Brian Alters,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: TEACHING EVOLUTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[104]  E. Mayr.  Cause and effect in biology. , 1961, Science.