Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy is widely used for breast cancer and is known to extend survival. Some clinicians seek a greater survival benefit by increasing the intensity of the dose, whereas others lower it to diminish toxicity. METHODS The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized trial of different levels of doses and dose intensity (dose per unit of time) of adjuvant chemotherapy in 1572 women with node-positive, stage II breast cancer who were assigned to three treatment groups. One group received 400 mg of cyclophosphamide per square meter of body-surface area and 40 mg of doxorubicin per square meter once every 28 days and 400 mg of fluorouracil per square meter twice every 28 days, for six cycles. Another group received 50 percent higher doses of the three drugs (600 mg, 60 mg, and 600 mg, respectively) but for only four cycles, so that the total dose was identical in these two groups but the dose intensity was higher in the first. The third group of women received half the total dose used in the other two groups and at half the dose intensity used in the second group. RESULTS After a median of 3.4 years of follow-up, the women treated with a high or moderate dose intensity had significantly longer disease-free survival (P < 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.004) than those treated with a low dose intensity, in three-way log-rank comparisons. However, the difference in survival between the two groups treated with a moderate or high dose intensity was not significant. These results are consistent with either a dose-response effect or a threshold level of the dose or dose intensity. CONCLUSIONS The doses of chemotherapy used to treat breast cancer, especially early breast cancer, should not be reduced if the maximal benefit is to be achieved.

[1]  B Fisher,et al.  Postoperative chemotherapy and tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone in the treatment of positive-node breast cancer patients aged 50 years and older with tumors responsive to tamoxifen: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-16. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Gelber,et al.  Improved methodology for analyzing local and distant recurrence. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  W. Wood,et al.  A feasibility study of intensive CAF as outpatient adjuvant therapy for stage II breast cancer in a cooperative group: CALGB 8443. , 1990, Cancer investigation.

[4]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Karnofsky memorial lecture. Conceptual and practical advances in the management of breast cancer. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Gelman,et al.  Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  G. Canellos The dose dilemma. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer. An overview of 61 randomized trials among 28,896 women , 1988 .

[8]  M. Zelen,et al.  A randomized trial of adjuvant combination chemotherapy with or without prednisone in premenopausal breast cancer patients with metastases in one to three axillary lymph nodes. , 1985, Cancer research.

[9]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .