Undergraduate Students’ Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning in Biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences

This study reports the findings of a study which examined the relationship between conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in biology. This study, which used structural equation modelling, also sorted to identify gender differences in the relationship. Two questionnaires, the Conceptions of Learning Biology (COLB) and the Approaches to Learning Biology (ALB), were developed to investigate 582 undergraduate biology majors’ (275 females and 307 males) conceptions of and approaches to learning biology, respectively. The results indicate a general trend that, while the students possessing lower-level COLB, ‘Memorizing’, ‘Testing’, and ‘Calculating and Practising’, tend to adopt a surface approach to learning in biology, the students expressing higher-level conceptions, ‘Increasing one’s knowledge’, ‘Application’, and ‘Understanding and seeing in a new way’, are more likely to adopt a deep approach to learning in biology. This study also found several salient gender differences in the COLB, as well as in the way in which the COLB affected the ALB. For example, female students tended to express more sophisticated COLB than male students. The ‘Memorizing’ conception of learning biology held by male students is inclined to engender both deep motive and deep strategy, but this tendency was not found among the female students.

[1]  John Biggs,et al.  Enhancing Learning: A Matter of Style or Approach? , 2014 .

[2]  Gavin T. L. Brown,et al.  Secondary school students' conceptions of learning and their relationship to achievement , 2010 .

[3]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  The Relations Between Scientific Epistemological Beliefs and Approaches to Learning Science Among Science-Major Undergraduates in Taiwan , 2010 .

[4]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Relational Analysis of College Science‐Major Students’ Epistemological Beliefs Toward Science and Conceptions of Learning Science , 2010 .

[5]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  Chia-Ching Lin,et al.  The Relationships between Students' Conceptions of Learning Engineering and their Preferences for Classroom and Laboratory Learning Environments , 2009 .

[7]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Conceptions of Learning Management among Undergraduate Students in Taiwan , 2008 .

[8]  Shawn Van Etten,et al.  College Seniors' Theory of Their Academic Motivation. , 2008 .

[9]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Relationships between Student Cognitions and Their Effects on Study Strategies. , 2008 .

[10]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis , 2008 .

[11]  M. Prosser,et al.  Variation in Student Reflections on their Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning Biochemistry in a First‐year Health Sciences’ Service Subject , 2006 .

[12]  J. Meece,et al.  Gender and motivation , 2006 .

[13]  P. H. Miller,et al.  Gender Differences in High‐school Students’ Views about Science , 2006 .

[14]  G. H. Smith,et al.  Intention, Approach and Outcome: University Mathematics Students' Conceptions of Learning Mathematics , 2005 .

[15]  Chin-Chung Tsai.  Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis , 2004 .

[16]  J. Biggs,et al.  Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[17]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[18]  A. Duff.  Approaches to learning: factor invariance across gender , 2002 .

[19]  P. Alexander,et al.  Beliefs About Academic Knowledge , 2001 .

[20]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics 2002 , 2001 .

[21]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[22]  P. Zeegers,et al.  Approaches to learning in science: a longitudinal study. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[23]  Barry C. Dart,et al.  Students' Conceptions of Learning, the Classroom Environment, and Approaches to Learning , 2000 .

[24]  B. Woolnough,et al.  Students' conceptions of learning in an engineering context , 1999 .

[25]  Geert ten Dam,et al.  A multilevel meta‐analysis of gender differences in learning orientations , 1998 .

[26]  F. Marton,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong , 1997 .

[27]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Approaches to Studying: age, gender and academic performance , 1996 .

[28]  Keithia Lynne Wilson,et al.  Gender differences in approaches to learning in first year psychology students , 1996 .

[29]  N. Purdie,et al.  Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies : a cross-cultural comparison. , 1996 .

[30]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[31]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.

[32]  Marie Schmidt,et al.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1992 .

[33]  C. A. Merwe,et al.  Gender as a factor in student learning: preliminary findings , 1989, Medical education.

[34]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Gender and Science Achievement: A Reanalysis of Studies from Two Meta-Analyses. , 1989 .

[35]  E. V. Rossum,et al.  The Relationship between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome. , 1984 .

[36]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  A review of the research of Ference Marton and the Goteborg Group: A phenomenological research perspective on learning , 1982 .

[37]  John Biggs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1978 .

[38]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[39]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[40]  Chin-Chung Tsai.  Biological knowledge is more tentative than physics knowledge: Taiwan high school adolescents' views about the nature of biology and physics. , 2006, Adolescence.

[41]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments. , 2004 .

[42]  J. Brownlee,et al.  An investigation of student teachers' knowledge about their own learning , 2003 .

[43]  J. Wandersee,et al.  The Nature of Biology Knowledge , 2002 .

[44]  L. Unwin,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2002 .

[45]  D. Hounsell.  The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[46]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender, subject and context as determinants of approaches to studying in higher education , 1995 .

[47]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory , 1993 .

[48]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[49]  C. D. Miller.  Learning Approaches and Motives: Male and Female Differences and Implications for Learning Assistance Programs. , 1990 .

[50]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .