Joint Estimation of Bulk Flow Velocity and Angle Using a Lateral Line Probe

Measurement of complex natural flows, especially those occurring in rivers due to man-made structures, is often hampered by the limitations of existing flow measurement methods. Furthermore, there is a growing need for new measurement devices that are capable of measuring the hydrodynamic characteristics of complex natural flows required in environmental studies that often use fish as an indicator of ecological health. In this paper, we take the first step toward in situ natural flow measurements with a new biologically inspired probe design in conjunction with signal processing methods. The device presented in this paper is a dedicated hydrodynamically sensitive sensor array following the fish lateral line sensor modality. Low-level multidimensional sensor signals are transformed to the two key hydrodynamic primitives, bulk flow velocity and bulk flow angle. We show that this can be achieved via canonical signal transformation and kernel ridge regression, allowing velocity estimates with a less than 10 cm/s error. The approach provides robust velocity estimates not only when the sensor is ideally oriented parallel to the bulk flow, but also across the full range of angular deviations up to a completely orthogonal orientation by correcting the pressure field asymmetry for large angular deviations. Furthermore, we show that their joint estimation becomes feasible above a threshold current velocity of 0.45 m/s. The method demonstrated an error of 14 cm/s in velocity estimation in a river environment after training in laboratory conditions.

[1]  Ramon Cabrera,et al.  Acoustic-Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) for Laboratory Use , 1994 .

[2]  Francis D. Lagor,et al.  BIO-INSPIRED FLOW SENSING AND CONTROL : AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER NAVIGATION USING DISTRIBUTED PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS , 2013 .

[3]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Distant touch hydrodynamic imaging with an artificial lateral line , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Peter P. Pott,et al.  Flow-aided path following of an underwater robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  M. D. Vittorio,et al.  Parylene-coated bioinspired artificial hair cell for liquid flow sensing , 2012 .

[6]  Alexander Gammerman,et al.  Ridge Regression Learning Algorithm in Dual Variables , 1998, ICML.

[7]  G. Batchelor,et al.  The theory of homogeneous turbulence , 1954 .

[8]  T. Pitcher,et al.  A blind fish can school. , 1976, Science.

[9]  T J Carlson,et al.  Design and implementation of a new autonomous sensor fish to support advanced hydropower development. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[10]  J. Westerweel Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[11]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  A flexible liquid crystal polymer MEMS pressure sensor array for fish-like underwater sensing , 2012 .

[12]  Yulong Zhao,et al.  A temperature compensation system for silicon pressure sensor based on neural networks , 2014, The 9th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS).

[13]  Gijsbertus J.M. Krijnen,et al.  Design and fabrication process for artificial lateral line sensors , 2012 .

[14]  Guo Shu-wen A temperature compensation algorithm of piezoresistive pressure sensor and software implementation , 2013 .

[15]  M. McHenry,et al.  The Biophysics of the Fish Lateral Line , 2013 .

[16]  Wenjun Xie,et al.  A pressure sensor calibration model based on Support Vector Machine , 2012, CCDC 2012.

[17]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  A bio-mimetic design and control of a fish-like robot using compliant structures , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR).

[18]  John Kleppe,et al.  Point Velocity Measurement , 1999 .

[19]  Saulo Finco,et al.  Silicon Multi-Stage Current-Mode Piezoresistive Pressure Sensor with analog temperature compensation , 2011, 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings.

[20]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Lateral line layout correlates with the differential hydrodynamic pressure on swimming fish. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[21]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Flow-relative control of an underwater robot , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  J. Webster Mechanical Variables Measurement - Solid, Fluid, and Thermal , 1991 .

[23]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Hydrodynamic pressure sensing with an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flows , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  Lily D. Chambers,et al.  What information do Kármán streets offer to flow sensing? , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[25]  Pawel Ligeza Use of Natural Fluctuations of Flow Parameters for Measurement of Velocity Vector , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[26]  Lily D. Chambers,et al.  A fish perspective: detecting flow features while moving using an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flow , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Lateral line system of fish. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[28]  R. Cingolani,et al.  Stress-driven AlN cantilever-based flow sensor for fish lateral line system , 2011 .

[29]  Shaogang Gong,et al.  Cumulative Attribute Space for Age and Crowd Density Estimation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[30]  Takuma Suzuki,et al.  Noise of Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data in Bubbly Flows , 2007 .

[31]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Smart Skins: Information Processing by Lateral Line Flow Sensors , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[32]  Ke Chen,et al.  Learning to Count with Back-propagated Information , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[33]  G. Lauder,et al.  Fish Exploiting Vortices Decrease Muscle Activity , 2003, Science.

[34]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  An experimental contribution to near-wall measurements by means of a special laser Doppler anemometry technique , 2002 .

[35]  Olivier Richoux,et al.  Laser Doppler Velocimetry for Joint Measurements of Acoustic and Mean Flow Velocities: LMS-Based Algorithm and CRB Calculation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[36]  Hong Lei,et al.  Distributed flow estimation and closed-loop control of an underwater vehicle with a multi-modal artificial lateral line , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[37]  C. Tropea,et al.  Laser Doppler and Phase Doppler Measurement Techniques , 2002 .

[38]  Novel particle image velocimetry system based on three-color pulsed lamps and image processing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[39]  L. Lourenco,et al.  On the accuracy of velocity and vorticity measurements with PIV , 1995 .

[40]  Tan Shi-zhe,et al.  Underwater artificial lateral line flow sensors , 2014 .

[41]  A. Roy,et al.  Measuring water velocity in highly turbulent flows: field tests of an electromagnetic current meter (ECM) and an acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) , 2007 .

[42]  Luca Bertuccioli,et al.  A Submersible Particle Image Velocimetry System for Turbulence Measurements in the Bottom Boundary Layer , 1999 .

[43]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Face Recognition Using Kernel Ridge Regression , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[44]  J. Crimaldi,et al.  The accuracy of acoustic Doppler velocimetry measurements in turbulent boundary layer flows over a smooth bed , 2007 .

[45]  Jack Chen,et al.  Design and fabrication of artificial lateral line flow sensors , 2002 .

[46]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Coping with flow: behavior, neurophysiology and modeling of the fish lateral line system , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.