The Effects of Communication Motives, Interaction Involvement, and Loneliness on Satisfaction

A small group model was tested that traced the path by which communication motives influenced interaction involvement and loneliness and the ways that these factors, in turn, influenced group satisfaction. Results indicated that pleasure was a reason for communicating responsively, whereas escape, control, and inclusion were not reasons. Escape was not a motive reported by those who were lonely. With regard to group satisfaction, it was found that loneliness was a mediatingfactor in that members who interacted responsively were not lonely, and those who were not lonely reported satisfaction with the group. Finally, there was a direct link between the need for affection and satisfaction. Implications of the model's findings support the need for communication skills training and understanding members' motives for interacting in ongoing task groups.

[1]  R. Rubin,et al.  Test of a self‐efficacy model of interpersonal communication competence , 1993 .

[2]  Elizabeth E. Graham,et al.  The interpersonal communication motives model , 1993 .

[3]  E. Perse,et al.  Interpersonal Communication Motives and the Life Position of Elders , 1992 .

[4]  Rebecca B. Rubin,et al.  Antecedents of interpersonal communication motivation , 1992 .

[5]  Lawrence A. Hosman.  The relationships among need for privacy, loneliness, conversational sensitivity, and interpersonal communication motives , 1991 .

[6]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[7]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context , 1990 .

[8]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Do we have any theories of group communication , 1990 .

[9]  M. Javidi,et al.  Linking communication motives to loneliness in the lives of older adults: An empirical test of interpersonal needs and gratifications , 1990 .

[10]  L. B. Rosenfeld,et al.  The Measurement of Cohesion and its Relationship to Dimensions of Self-Disclosure in Classroom Settings , 1989 .

[11]  P. E. Mudrack,et al.  Defining Group Cohesiveness , 1989 .

[12]  Alan L. Sillars,et al.  Further examination of nonverbal manifestations of interaction involvement , 1989 .

[13]  R. Rubin,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives , 1988 .

[14]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Small Group Consensus , 1988 .

[15]  Roger C. Pace.  Communication Patterns in High and Low Consensus Discussions: A Descriptive Analysis. , 1988 .

[16]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Loneliness and Relationally Competent Communication , 1985 .

[17]  J. Daly,et al.  Some communicator correlates of loneliness , 1985 .

[18]  R. Duran,et al.  Loneliness, communicative competence, and communication apprehension: Extension and replication , 1985 .

[19]  Peter W. Dorfman,et al.  The Effects of Group Performance on Cognitions, Satisfaction, and Behavior: A Process Model , 1984 .

[20]  Rolayne S. Destephen.  Group interaction differences between high and low consensus groups , 1983 .

[21]  Grant T. Savage,et al.  An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept , 1982 .

[22]  R. Duran,et al.  All the Lonely People: The Relationship among Loneliness, Communicative Competence, and Communication Anxiety. , 1982 .

[23]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  Consensus Group Decision-Making, Quality of Decision, and Group Satisfaction: An Attempt to Sort "Fact" from "Fiction.". , 1982 .

[24]  R. Stockton.  Developing cohesion in small groups: Theory and research , 1981 .

[25]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  An Examination of Television Viewing Motivations , 1981 .

[26]  D. Cegala,et al.  Interaction Involvement: A Cognitive Dimension of Communicative Competence. , 1981 .

[27]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Loneliness and social contact. , 1981 .

[28]  David W. Wright,et al.  Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique , 1980 .

[29]  A. Paul Hare.  Consensus Versus Majority Vote , 1980 .

[30]  A. Rubin.  TELEVISION USE BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS , 1979 .

[31]  W. E. Jurma,et al.  Effects of leader structuring style and task‐orientation characteristics of group members , 1979 .

[32]  S. Weinberg.  Measurement of communication aspects of group cohesion , 1979 .

[33]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus , 1979 .

[34]  M. Hecht.  Measures of Communication Satisfaction , 1978 .

[35]  W. E. Jurma,et al.  Leadership Structuring Style, Task Ambiguity, and Group Member Satisfaction , 1978 .

[36]  Douglas G. Bock,et al.  A comparison of the distributional and sequential structures of interaction in high and low consensus groups , 1973 .

[37]  Dale G. Leathers.  Quality of group communication as a determinant of group product , 1972 .

[38]  E. Thomas,et al.  Models of group problem solving. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.