COLLEGE IMPACT ON STUDENT LEARNING: Comparing the Use of Self-Reported Gains, Standardized Test Scores, and College Grades

To examine the impact of college researchershave used a variety of measures of learning and fairlycomparable results have been obtained. This studyundertakes a direct comparison of three learningindicators: college grade-point average, student reportedgrowth (Verbal and Quantitative), and GRE scores(Verbal, Quantitative, and Composite). The same set ofindependent variables was regressed onto each dependent measure using a national sample of 2,289students. Substantive interpretations are presented andcomparisons are made for paired regressions usingalternate indicators. This paper provides evidencesuggesting that (1) student-reported cognitive growthsurvey items have a modest relative validity; (2) theattenuation associated with the use of residual gainscores does not invalidate their use; and (3) comparable results are obtained when using the college GPAand standardized test scores. It is concluded that thealternate measures can be used as proxies for moredirect measures of learning.

[1]  Raymond H. Phillippi,et al.  Generalizability of the Differential Coursework methodology: Relationships between self-reported Coursework and performance on the ACT-COMP exam , 1989 .

[2]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[3]  T. Shuell Cognitive Conceptions of Learning , 1986 .

[4]  Gary R. Pike,et al.  Limitations of using students' self-reports of academic development as proxies for traditional achievement measures , 1995 .

[5]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Information‐processing analysis of college teaching , 1979 .

[6]  A. Astin Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[7]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[8]  Gary R. Pike,et al.  The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores , 1995 .

[9]  J. Centra,et al.  The Effects of Academic Departments on Student Learning. , 1977 .

[10]  Mandler JeanM. A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval , 1978 .

[11]  Leonard S. Cahen,et al.  Educational Testing Service , 1970 .

[12]  M. Deutsch A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[13]  C. Adelman Performance and Judgment: Essays on Principles and Practice in the Assessment of College Student Learning. , 1988 .

[14]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[15]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[16]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[17]  Actions Matter: The Case for Indirect Measures in Assessing Higher Education's Progress on the National Education Goals. , 1991 .

[18]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[19]  A. Astin,et al.  Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education. , 1991 .