Marketizing higher education: neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies

[The article had no abstract; the following text is drawn from the Introduction and Conclusion.] Higher education has become a terrain for marketization agendas. Since the 1980s universities have been urged to adopt commercial models of knowledge, skills, curriculum, finance, accounting, and management organization. Neoliberal strategies for higher education have the following features: all constituencies are treated through business relationships; educational efficiency, accountability and quality are redefined in accountancy terms; courses are recast as instructional commodities; student-teacher relations are mediated by the consumption and production of things, e.g. software products, performance criteria, etc. These general tendencies are manifest in diverse ways across geopolitical contexts: the 'information society' as a paradigm for ICT in education; the World Bank 'reform agenda' for the self-financing of higher education; Africa, where higher education is being forcibly marketized and standardized through financial dependence; North America, where some universities attempt to become global vendors of instructional commodities; Europe, where state bodies adopt industry agendas of labour flexibilisation as an educational model, in the guise of technological progress; and the UK, where ICT design becomes a terrain for contending educational agendas. This analysis can inform counter-strategies, especially the following elements: demonstrating links among neoliberal forms; linking resistances across constituencies and places; de-reifying Information and Communication Technology (ICT); and developing alternative pedagogies.

[1]  G. R. Evans.  The Integrity Of Uk Academic Research Under Commercial Threat , 2001 .

[2]  H. Willmott.  Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. , 1995 .

[3]  D. Robertson.  The Future of International Trade , 1938 .

[4]  P. Streeten.  Globalisation: Threat or Opportunity , 2001 .

[5]  D. Johnstone,et al.  The financing and management of higher education : a status report on worldwide reforms , 1998 .

[6]  T. Veblen.  The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men , 1965 .

[7]  W. Dutton.  Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities , 1996 .

[8]  Patrick Ainley,et al.  The Business of Learning: Staff and Student Experiences of Further Education in the 1990s , 1997 .

[9]  Langdon Winner.  Report from the digital diploma mills conference , 1998 .

[10]  Philip E. Agre.  The Distances of Education. , 1999 .

[11]  George Monbiot,et al.  Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain , 2000 .

[12]  Joyce M. Gattas,et al.  The University of the Future , 1994 .

[13]  S. Federici,et al.  A thousand flowers : social struggles against structural adjustment in African universities , 2000 .

[14]  Frank Webster,et al.  The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society , 1997 .

[15]  D. Noble.  Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education , 1998 .

[16]  Rita Johnston.  Beyond Flexibility: Issues and Implications for Higher Education. , 1999 .

[17]  Katia Passerini,et al.  A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet , 2000 .

[18]  G. Rikowski.  The Battle in Seattle: its significance for education , 2002 .

[19]  N. Rose.  Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought , 1999 .

[20]  P. Agre.  Commodity and Community: Institutional Design for the Networked University. , 2001 .

[21]  R. Newman,et al.  Sites for Power and Knowledge? Towards a critique of the virtual university , 1999 .

[22]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[23]  David Demeritt,et al.  The new social contract for science: Accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy , 2000 .

[24]  D. Harvie,et al.  Alienation, Class and Enclosure in UK Universities , 2000 .

[25]  H. Kroemer,et al.  The university of the future , 2007, Nature.

[26]  P. Gottschalk,et al.  Cross-National Differences in the Rise in Earnings Inequality: Market and Institutional Factors , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[27]  Travis Reindl.  Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education , 2002 .