Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design.

The long-term success of artificial-joint replacement depends partly on the chances for acrylic cement failure and interface disruption. These chances can be diminished by an optimal load-transfer mechanism, whereby stress concentrations are avoided. The present paper introduces a method for numerical shape optimization, whereby the finite element method is used iteratively to determine optimal prosthetic designs, which minimize interface stresses. The method is first applied in a simplified one-dimensional model of a cemented femoral stem fixation, using acrylic cement. The results show that 30-70% cement and interface stress reductions can be obtained in principle with an optimized design. Although the actual optimal shape is susceptible to the characteristics of the joint load, the stem length, stem modulus, cement modulus and bone properties, its general geometrical characteristics are consistent, featuring proximal and distal tapers, and a belly-shaped middle region. These general characteristics are confirmed in a more realistic two-dimensional FEM model. It is concluded that this method of shape optimization can provide a meaningful basis for prosthetic design and analysis activities in general.

[1]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  Application of numerical shape optimization to artificial-joint design , 1988 .

[2]  Y. Yoon,et al.  Shape optimal design of the stem of a cemented hip prosthesis to minimize stress concentration in the cement layer. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F. G. Evans,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone. , 1969, Artificial limbs.

[5]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  The effect of interface loosening on the stress distribution in intramedullary fixated artificial joints , 1980 .

[6]  R A Brand,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis: a new method for implant design and a comparison with parametric finite element analysis. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  E Y Chao,et al.  A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Huiskes Biomechanics of Bone—Implant Interactions , 1986 .

[11]  R. N. Stauffer Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  D T Davy,et al.  Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.