The role of dynamic stimulation pattern in the analysis of bistable intracellular networks

Bistable systems play an important role in the functioning of living cells. Depending on the strength of the necessary positive feedback one can distinguish between (irreversible) "one-way switch" or (reversible) "toggle-switch" type behavior. Besides the well- established steady-state properties, some important characteristics of bistable systems arise from an analysis of their dynamics. We demonstrate that a supercritical stimulus amplitude is not sufficient to move the system from the lower (off-state) to the higher branch (on-state) for either a step or a pulse input. A switching surface is identified for the system as a function of the initial condition, input pulse amplitude and duration (a supercritical signal). We introduce the concept of bounded autonomy for single level systems with a pulse input. Towards this end, we investigate and characterize the role of the duration of the stimulus. Furthermore we show, that a minimal signal power is also necessary to change the steady state of the bistable system. This limiting signal power is independent of the applied stimulus and is determined only by systems parameters. These results are relevant for the design of experiments, where it is often difficult to create a defined pattern for the stimulus. Furthermore, intracellular processes, like receptor internalization, do manipulate the level of stimulus such that level and duration of the stimulus is conducive to characteristic behavior.

[1]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  F. Allgöwer,et al.  Bistability Analyses of a Caspase Activation Model for Receptor-induced Apoptosis* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  J E Ferrell,et al.  How regulated protein translocation can produce switch-like responses. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  D. Angeli,et al.  New analysis technique for multistability detection. , 2006, Systems biology.

[5]  John J. Tyson,et al.  The Dynamics of Feedback Control Circuits in Biochemical Pathways , 1978 .

[6]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[7]  Eric Bullinger,et al.  Approximations and their consequences for dynamic modelling of signal transduction pathways. , 2007, Mathematical biosciences.

[8]  Siren R. Veflingstad,et al.  Effect of time delay on pattern formation : Competition between homogenisation and patterning , 2005 .

[9]  R. Thomas,et al.  Multistationarity, the basis of cell differentiation and memory. I. Structural conditions of multistationarity and other nontrivial behavior. , 2001, Chaos.

[10]  J. Tyson,et al.  The dynamics of cell cycle regulation. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[11]  C. Thron,et al.  Theoretical dynamics of the cyclin B-MPF system: a possible role for p13suc1. , 1994, Bio Systems.

[12]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[13]  J. Ferrell Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[15]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  The dynamic systems approach to control and regulation of intracellular networks , 2005, FEBS letters.

[16]  M Laurent,et al.  Multistability: a major means of differentiation and evolution in biological systems. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[17]  F. Schlögl Chemical reaction models for non-equilibrium phase transitions , 1972 .

[18]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[19]  J. Downward The ins and outs of signalling , 2001, Nature.

[20]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Signaling switches and bistability arising from multisite phosphorylation in protein kinase cascades , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  H. Gutfreund,et al.  Enzyme kinetics , 1975, Nature.

[22]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Bistability in cell signaling: How to make continuous processes discontinuous, and reversible processes irreversible. , 2001, Chaos.

[23]  J. Demongeot,et al.  Positive and negative feedback: striking a balance between necessary antagonists. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[25]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[26]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  M. Mesarovic,et al.  Search for organising principles: understanding in systems biology. , 2004, Systems biology.

[28]  J. Lisman A mechanism for memory storage insensitive to molecular turnover: a bistable autophosphorylating kinase. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  R. Bracewell The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[30]  J. Tyson Modeling the cell division cycle: cdc2 and cyclin interactions. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Mesarovic,et al.  Feedback dynamics and cell function: Why systems biology is called Systems Biology. , 2005, Molecular bioSystems.

[32]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical models of protein kinase signal transduction. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[33]  S. Leibler,et al.  Biological rhythms: Circadian clocks limited by noise , 2000, Nature.

[34]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Effects of sequestration on signal transduction cascades , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[35]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  F. Schlögl,et al.  On stability of steady states , 1971 .

[37]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[38]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A Computational Study of Feedback Effects on Signal Dynamics in a Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway Model , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[39]  A. Cornish-Bowden Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics , 1979 .

[40]  S. White,et al.  RNAi-mediated chromatin silencing in fission yeast. , 2008, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[41]  O Wolkenhauer,et al.  A systems- and signal-oriented approach to intracellular dynamics. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[42]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Direct Lyapunov exponent analysis enables parametric study of transient signalling governing cell behaviour. , 2006, Systems biology.

[43]  I. Madshus,et al.  Signalling from Internalized Growth Factor Receptors , 2004, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology.

[44]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Threshold responses to morphogen gradients by zero-order ultrasensitivity , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[46]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2003, Nature.