Comparison of Laboratory Cracking Test Results with Field Performance of Moderate and High RAP Content Surface Mixtures on the NCAT Test Track
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dar-Hao Chen. Field Experiences with RDD and Overlay Tester for Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation , 2008 .
[2] Reynaldo Roque,et al. Development and Field Evaluation of Energy-Based Criteria for Top-down Cracking Performance of Hot Mix Asphalt , 2004 .
[3] A C Pronk,et al. COMPARISON OF 2 AND 4 POINT FATIGUE TESTS AND HEALING IN 4 POINT DYNAMIC BENDING TEST BASED ON THE DISSIPATED ENERGY CONCEPT , 1997 .
[4] Nam H Tran,et al. Testing of Moderate and High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content Mixes , 2009 .
[5] Y. Richard Kim,et al. Fatigue Performance Prediction of North Carolina Mixtures Using the Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model , 2010 .
[6] Y. Richard Kim,et al. Characterization and performance prediction of ALF mixtures using a viscoelastoplastic continuum damage model , 2006 .
[7] Nam H Tran,et al. Correlating Laboratory Fatigue Endurance Limits to Field-Measured Strains , 2011 .
[8] D. Little,et al. Fatigue characterization of asphalt concrete using viscoelasticity and continuum damage theory , 1997 .
[9] Pedro Romero,et al. FATIGUE RESPONSE OF ASPHALT MIXTURES TESTED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION'S ACCELERATED LOADING FACILITY , 2000 .
[10] Jianlin Wang,et al. Windows-Based Top-Down Cracking Design Tool for Florida , 2007 .