The effect of context on the structure of categories

Abstract Three experiments examined the effect of context on the representativeness ordering of exemplars of a category. Experiments 1 and 2 employed an online reading time paradigm to examine the effect of context on the time it takes to establish an anaphoric reference between an exemplar and a category term. Experiment 1 demonstrated that context can change the relation between a category term and an exemplar at the time of comprehension. Experiment 2 showed that category terms presented in context generate graded goodness-of-example distributions of exemplars that are different from the distributions generated in the absence of explicit context. These distributions cannot be derived by assuming that the exemplar most strongly suggested by the context serves as the category representation. Experiment 3 employed a membership verification paradigm. Response time was found to be a function of degree of relatedness to the contextdependent category representation. Typicality, as determined in the absence of explicit context, had no effect on decision time. Several models, including some extensions of current semantic memory theories, are developed to account for the results of these experiments.

[1]  D. Meyer.  On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information , 1970 .

[2]  Murray Singer,et al.  Processes of inference during sentence encoding , 1979 .

[3]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. , 1977 .

[4]  R. Lorch.  The role of two types of semantic information in the processing of false sentences , 1978 .

[5]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. , 1974 .

[7]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Coherence and Coreference , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[9]  Allan Collins,et al.  Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. , 1972 .

[10]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[11]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of relation strength and semantic overlap on retrieval and comparison processes during sentence verification , 1981 .

[12]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Alternative conceptions of semantic theory , 1975, Cognition.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .

[14]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[15]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Production frequency and the verification of quantified statements , 1974 .

[16]  E. Rosch.  ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[17]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[18]  John I. Kiger,et al.  Role of antonymy relations in semantic judgments. , 1979 .

[19]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .

[20]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[21]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[22]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  The role of inferences in discourse comprehension , 1976 .

[23]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[24]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[25]  G. Bower,et al.  Cognition in learning and memory , 1974 .

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[27]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[29]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[30]  William E. Gumenik,et al.  The advantage of specific terms over general terms as cues for sentence recall: Instantiation or retrieval? , 1979 .

[31]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[32]  Emilie Matarasso Roth.  Context Effects on the Representation of Meaning , 1980 .

[33]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[34]  Gregg T. Vesonder,et al.  On the representation of prose: New dimensions , 1978 .

[35]  E. Rosch,et al.  Relationships among goodness-of-example, category norms, and word frequency , 1976 .

[36]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[37]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information , 2022 .

[38]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Understanding noun phrases , 1979 .

[39]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[40]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[41]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Instantiation of general terms , 1976 .

[42]  A. Wilkins.  Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time , 1971 .

[43]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.