Energetics of bipedal running. I. Metabolic cost of generating force.

Similarly sized bipeds and quadrupeds use nearly the same amount of metabolic energy to run, despite dramatic differences in morphology and running mechanics. It has been shown that the rate of metabolic energy use in quadrupedal runners and bipedal hoppers can be predicted from just body weight and the time available to generate force as indicated by the duration of foot-ground contact. We tested whether this link between running mechanics and energetics also applies to running bipeds. We measured rates of energy consumption and times of foot contact for humans (mean body mass 78.88 kg) and five species of birds (mean body mass range 0.13-40.1 kg). We find that most (70-90%) of the increase in metabolic rate with speed in running bipeds can be explained by changes in the time available to generate force. The rate of force generation also explains differences in metabolic rate over the size range of birds measured. However, for a given rate of force generation, birds use on average 1.7 times more metabolic energy than quadrupeds. The rate of energy consumption for a given rate of force generation for humans is intermediate between that of birds and quadrupeds. These results support the idea that the cost of muscular force production determines the energy cost of running and suggest that bipedal runners use more energy for a given rate of force production because they require a greater volume of muscle to support their body weight.

[1]  M. Bárány,et al.  ATPase Activity of Myosin Correlated with Speed of Muscle Shortening , 1967, The Journal of general physiology.

[2]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Running on Two or on Four Legs: Which Consumes More Energy? , 1973, Science.

[3]  M A Fedak,et al.  Energy cost of bipedal running. , 1974, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Fedak,et al.  Reappraisal of energetics of locomotion shows identical cost in bipeds and quadrupeds including ostrich and horse , 1979, Nature.

[5]  T. McMahon,et al.  Energetic Cost of Generating Muscular Force During Running: A Comparison of Large and Small Animals , 1980 .

[6]  R. Alexander,et al.  Allometry of the leg muscles of mammals , 1981 .

[7]  M. Fedak,et al.  One-step N2-dilution technique for calibrating open-circuit VO2 measuring systems. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[8]  N. Heglund,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. , 1982, Annual review of physiology.

[9]  N. Heglund,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. IV. Total mechanical energy changes as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  A. Biewener Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  J A Rall,et al.  Energetic aspects of skeletal muscle contraction: implications of fiber types. , 1985, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[13]  Rall Ja,et al.  Energetic aspects of skeletal muscle contraction: implications of fiber types. , 1985 .

[14]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  N. Heglund,et al.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait? , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  A. Biewener Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. , 1989, Science.

[17]  R J Full,et al.  Effect of variation in form on the cost of terrestrial locomotion. , 1990, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  Peter R. Murgatroyd Energy metabolism in animals and man , 1990 .

[19]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Energetics of running: a new perspective , 1990, Nature.

[20]  A. Biewener Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion. , 1990, Science.

[21]  R. M. Alexander Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  S. Gatesy,et al.  Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans , 1991 .

[23]  Alexander Rm,et al.  Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. , 1991 .

[24]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Energetics of walking and running: insights from simulated reduced-gravity experiments. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Running springs: speed and animal size. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  A. Minetti,et al.  Mechanical determinants of the minimum energy cost of gradient running in humans. , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Relating mechanics and energetics during exercise. , 1994, Advances in veterinary science and comparative medicine.

[28]  T. Cr Relating mechanics and energetics during exercise. , 1994 .

[29]  B H Jones,et al.  Ambulatory foot contact monitor to estimate metabolic cost of human locomotion. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[30]  T. McMahon,et al.  Arms are different from legs: mechanics and energetics of human hand-running. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  T J Roberts,et al.  Muscular Force in Running Turkeys: The Economy of Minimizing Work , 1997, Science.

[32]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Energetics of bipedal running. II. Limb design and running mechanics. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.