Random matching under priorities: stability and no envy concepts

We consider stability concepts for random matchings where agents have preferences over objects and objects have priorities for the agents. When matchings are deterministic, the standard stability concept also captures the fairness property of no (justified) envy. When matchings can be random, there are a number of natural stability and fairness concepts that coincide with stability and no envy whenever matchings are deterministic. We formalize known stability concepts for random matchings for a general setting that allows weak preferences and weak priorities, unacceptability, and an unequal number of agents and objects. We then present a clear taxonomy of the stability concepts and identify logical relations between them. Finally, we present a transformation from the most general setting to the most restricted setting, and show how almost all our stability concepts are preserved by that transformation.

[1]  Tamás Fleiner,et al.  Fractional solutions for capacitated NTU-games, with applications to stable matchings , 2016, Discret. Optim..

[2]  Robert W. Irving Stable Marriage and Indifference , 1994, Discret. Appl. Math..

[3]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Stable Matchings, Optimal Assignments, and Linear Programming , 1993, Math. Oper. Res..

[4]  Vikram Manjunath,et al.  Stability and the Core of Probabilistic Marriage Problems , 2013 .

[5]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Consistent Probabilistic Social Choice , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  J. V. Vate Linear programming brings marital bliss , 1989 .

[7]  Jan Christoph Schlegel A note on ex-ante stable lotteries , 2018 .

[8]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  The Geometry of Fractional Stable Matchings and Its Applications , 1998, Math. Oper. Res..

[9]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Topics in Matrix Analysis , 1991 .

[10]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  A theory of school‐choice lotteries , 2015 .

[11]  Tamás Fleiner,et al.  On a lemma of Scarf , 2003, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[12]  Uriel G. Rothblum,et al.  Characterization of stable matchings as extreme points of a polytope , 1992, Math. Program..

[13]  U. Rothblum,et al.  Vacancy Chains and Equilibration in Senior-Level Labor Markets , 1997 .

[14]  Battal Dogan,et al.  Efficiency and Stability of Probabilistic Assignments in Marriage Problems , 2015, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Mechanism Design Approach to Student Assignment , 2011 .

[16]  M. Balinski,et al.  A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement , 1999 .

[17]  Mustafa Oguz Afacan,et al.  The object allocation problem with random priorities , 2018, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[19]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions , 2006, STOC '06.

[20]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  Fuhito Kojima,et al.  Incentives in the probabilistic serial mechanism , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Yuichiro Kamada,et al.  Stability concepts in matching under distributional constraints , 2017, J. Econ. Theory.

[23]  Lirong Xia,et al.  Ex post Efficiency of Random Assignments , 2015, AAMAS.

[24]  Muhammed A. Yıldırım,et al.  School Choice with Controlled Choice Constraints: Hard Bounds Versus Soft Bounds , 2012 .

[25]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  The lattice of envy-free matchings , 2018, Games Econ. Behav..

[26]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The New York City High School Match , 2005 .

[27]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Schemes That Mix Voting with Chance , 1977 .

[28]  A. Roth,et al.  School Choice , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  John von Neumann,et al.  1. A Certain Zero-sum Two-person Game Equivalent to the Optimal Assignment Problem , 1953 .

[30]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Boston Public School Match , 2005 .

[31]  A. Roth On the Allocation of Residents to Rural Hospitals: A General Property of Two-Sided Matching Markets , 1986 .

[32]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .