Is Mohs micrographic surgery more effective than wide local excision for treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in reducing risk of local recurrence? A Critically Appraised Topic

DFSP is a rare, locally aggressive cutaneous malignancy characterized by slow infiltrative growth, and a low risk for distant metastases. Wide local resection with surgical margins of 2– 3 cm is considered the standard surgical treatment but local recurrence is reported to occur in up to 60%, with most recurrences occurring within 3 years. Aggressive local recurrence following inadequate resection occurs as a result of infiltrative lateral projections of DFSP which can be missed clinically and histologically, resulting in high local recurrence rates following wider excision. MMS has emerged as an alternative to WLE for DFSP with case series reporting low rates of local recurrence. Access to MMS may not be widely available because of cost, whereas access to surgeons able to perform WLE is almost universal. The aim of this Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) is to determine whether MMS is more effective than WLE in reducing local recurrence for DFSP at 3 years follow-up.

[1]  J. Kane,et al.  Wide Excision or Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Primary Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans , 2009, American journal of clinical oncology.

[2]  N. Scuderi,et al.  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery. , 2008, Cancer treatment reviews.

[3]  J. Rosen,et al.  Surgical Treatment for Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: The Dartmouth Experience and Literature Review , 2008, Annals of plastic surgery.

[4]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  Systematic reviews: grading recommendations and evidence quality. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[5]  S. Snow,et al.  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A report on 29 patients treated by Mohs micrographic surgery with long‐term follow‐up and review of the literature , 2004, Cancer.

[6]  I. Jacobs,et al.  Outcomes of surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  V. Sondak,et al.  Low recurrence rate after surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans , 2004, Cancer.

[8]  D. Sanders,et al.  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated by micrographic surgery , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  V. Sondak,et al.  Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Results of a multiinstitutional series with an analysis of the extent of microscopic spread. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  R. Roenigk,et al.  A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  J. Zitelli,et al.  Surgical margins for excision of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  H. Breuninger,et al.  [Subclinical spread of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and resulting treatment modalities]. , 1994, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[13]  I. Jackson,et al.  Treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with Mohs micrographic surgery. , 1988, Annals of Surgery.

[14]  R. Dobson,et al.  British Association of Dermatologists , 2014 .

[15]  A. Nicastri,et al.  Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: An Analysis of 86 Cases Five with Metastasis , 1967, Annals of surgery.

[16]  E. B. Helwig,et al.  Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A study of 115 cases , 1962, Cancer.

[17]  G. Pack,et al.  DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS: A Report of Thirty-Nine Cases , 1951 .

[18]  G. Pack,et al.  Dermato-fibrosarcoma protuberans. A report of 39 cases. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of surgery.