Detecting Behavioral Biases in Mixed Human-Proxy Online Auction Markets

Currently many auction websites directly or indirectly provide support for the use of automated proxies or agents. Buyers can use proxies to monitor auctions and bid at the appropriate time and with the appropriate bid price, sellers can use proxies to set prices or negotiate deals. Proxy complexity varies, however most proxies first require some input on the part of the human trader and then perform the trading task autonomously. This paper proposes and tests a theoretical model of human behavior that can be used to detect behavioral biases in electronic market environments populated by humans and software agents. The paper also quantifies the effect of these biases on individual and business profits.

[1]  Paul Klemperer,et al.  Auctions: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[2]  Quang Vuong,et al.  First-Price Sealed-Bid Auctions with Secret Reservation Prices , 1994 .

[3]  V. Smith,et al.  INCENTIVES AND BEHAVIOR IN ENGLISH, DUTCH AND SEALED‐BID AUCTIONS , 1980 .

[4]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  C2C Versus B2C: A Comparison of the Winner's Curse in Two Types of Electronic Auctions , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[5]  Roumen Vragov,et al.  An experimental examination of demand reduction in multi‐unit versions of the Uniform‐price, Vickrey, and English auctions , 2006 .

[6]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[7]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Agent communication transfer protocol , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[8]  Roumen Vragov,et al.  Why is eBay the King of Internet Auctions? An Institutional Analysis Perspective , 2004 .

[9]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  Who Wins on eBay: An Analysis of Bidders and Their Bid Behaviours , 2003, Electron. Mark..

[10]  Barbara Stern,et al.  Consumer Bidding Behavior on Internet Auction Sites , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[11]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  REVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR E-BUSINESS: A PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE VIEW IN THE AGE OF THE INTERNET , 2006 .

[12]  V. Smith Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[13]  Stephen J. Rassenti,et al.  Testing Vickrey's and Other Simultaneous Multiple Unit Versions of the English Auction , 1991 .

[14]  T. Downs,et al.  System for foreign exchange trading using genetic algorithms and reinforcement learning , 2004, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[15]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  KQML as an agent communication language , 1994, CIKM '94.

[16]  Amy Greenwald The 2002 Trading Agent Competition: An Overview of Agent Strategies , 2003, AI Mag..

[17]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of Econometric Models: Relevance of Laboratory Experiments to Testing Resource Allocation Theory , 1980 .

[18]  V. Smith,et al.  Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions , 1988 .

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Evaggelia Pitoura,et al.  Mobile agents for WWW distributed database access , 1999, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.99CB36337).

[21]  V. Smith An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Alok Gupta,et al.  User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: an empirical exploration , 2004 .

[23]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[24]  Theron Alexander Children and adolescents: A biocultural approach to psychological development , 1969 .

[25]  David Lester,et al.  Liaw's Scales to Measure Attitudes toward Computers and the Internet , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Models of Thinking, Learning, and Teaching in Games , 2003 .

[27]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[28]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  When snipers become predators: can mechanism design save online auctions? , 2003, CACM.

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[30]  Thotsapon Sortrakul,et al.  Online Auction Site: Proxy Bid Service with Time Awareness Engine , 2005 .

[31]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[32]  V. Smith Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics , 2003 .

[33]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Putting Auction Theory to Work , 2004 .

[34]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality , 2002 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[36]  Christopher A. Miller,et al.  Human-Computer Etiquette: MANAGING EXPECTIONS with INTENTIONAL AGENTS , 2004 .

[37]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[38]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the sources of complexity in agent design , 2000, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[39]  Ian Domowitz Liquidity, Transaction Costs, and Reintermediation in Electronic Markets , 2002 .