The Vitotox and ToxTracker assays: A two-test combination for quick and reliable assessment of genotoxic hazards.

To ensure safety for humans, it is essential to characterize the genotoxic potential of new chemical entities, such as pharmaceutical and cosmetic substances. In a first tier, a battery of in vitro tests is recommended by international regulatory agencies. However, these tests suffer from inadequate specificity: compounds may be wrongly categorized as genotoxic, resulting in unnecessary, time-consuming, and expensive in vivo follow-up testing. In the last decade, novel assays (notably, reporter-based assays) have been developed in an attempt to overcome these drawbacks. Here, we have investigated the performance of two in vitro reporter-based assays, Vitotox and ToxTracker. A set of reference compounds was selected to span a variety of mechanisms of genotoxic action and applicability domains (e.g., pharmaceutical and cosmetic ingredients). Combining the performance of the two assays, we achieved 93% sensitivity and 79% specificity for prediction of gentoxicity for this set of compounds. Both assays permit quick high-throughput analysis of drug candidates, while requiring only small quantities of the test substances. Our study shows that these two assays, when combined, can be a reliable method for assessment of genotoxicity hazard.

[1]  David Kirkland,et al.  A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. , 2011, Mutation research.

[2]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells , 2015, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[3]  Annick Lauwers,et al.  Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development. , 2009, Mutation research.

[4]  H Mozdarani,et al.  Induction of cytogenetic adaptive response of mouse bone marrow cells to radiation by therapeutic doses of bleomycin sulfate and actinomycin D as assayed by the micronucleus test. , 1994, Cancer letters.

[5]  Vera Rogiers,et al.  Way forward in case of a false positive in vitro genotoxicity result for a cosmetic substance? , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[6]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of nitroarenes. All nitro-containing chemicals were not created equal. , 1983, Mutation research.

[7]  A. Nair,et al.  Validation of a human cell based high-throughput genotoxicity assay 'Anthem's Genotoxicity screen' using ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[8]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests. , 2016, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[9]  Michael D Waters,et al.  Approaches for identifying germ cell mutagens: Report of the 2013 IWGT workshop on germ cell assays(☆). , 2015, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[10]  David Kirkland,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo. , 2005, Mutation research.

[11]  K T Chung,et al.  Base-pair mutation caused by four nitro-group containing aromatic amines in Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA104, TA4001 and TA4006. , 1997, Mutation research.

[12]  J. S. Wassom,et al.  Reflections on the origins and evolution of genetic toxicology and the environmental mutagen society , 2010, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[13]  L. Verschaeve,et al.  VITOTOX® bacterial genotoxicity and toxicity test for the rapid screening of chemicals , 1999, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop. , 2008, Mutation research.

[15]  Bob van de Water,et al.  The ToxTracker assay: novel GFP reporter systems that provide mechanistic insight into the genotoxic properties of chemicals. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. , 2005, Mutation research.

[17]  Vera Rogiers,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the mutagenicity/genotoxicity data of the cosmetic ingredients present on the Annexes of the Cosmetic EU legislation (2000-12). , 2014, Mutagenesis.

[18]  R. Lorenzetti,et al.  Forward mutation assays using bacteria and 8-azaguanine. , 1978, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[19]  W. Schoonen,et al.  The development of RAD51C, Cystatin A, p53 and Nrf2 luciferase-reporter assays in metabolically competent HepG2 cells for the assessment of mechanism-based genotoxicity and of oxidative stress in the early research phase of drug development. , 2010, Mutation research.

[20]  M. Markowicz,et al.  Adaptation of High-Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery—Toxicological Screening Tests , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[21]  Nirmala Bhogal,et al.  The use of human cell line reporter gene-based assays in chemical toxicity testing. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[22]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. , 2012, Mutation research.

[23]  M. Friedman,et al.  In vitro mutagenicity and cell transformation screening of caprolactam. , 1979, Environmental mutagenesis.

[24]  L. Verschaeve,et al.  The VITOTOX test, an SOS bioluminescence Salmonella typhimurium test to measure genotoxicity kinetics. , 1997, Mutation research.

[25]  G. Stelma,et al.  Comparison of the Salmonella (Ames) test, Umu tests, and the sos chromotests for detecting genotoxins , 1990, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[26]  Harry Vrieling,et al.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding. , 2016, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  Richard M Walmsley,et al.  High-specificity and high-sensitivity genotoxicity assessment in a human cell line: validation of the GreenScreen HC GADD45a-GFP genotoxicity assay. , 2006, Mutation research.

[28]  W. Whong,et al.  Validation of the Salmonella (SV50)/arabinose-resistant forward mutation assay system with 26 compounds. , 1984, Mutation research.