Controllability of the better chosen partial networks

How to control large complex networks is a great challenge. Recent studies have proved that the whole network can be sufficiently steered by injecting control signals into a minimum set of driver nodes, and the minimum numbers of driver nodes for many real networks are high, indicating that it is difficult to control them. For some large natural and technological networks, it is impossible and not feasible to control the full network. For example, in biological networks like large-scale gene regulatory networks it is impossible to control all the genes. This prompts us to explore the question how to choose partial networks that are easy for controlling and important in networked systems. In this work, we propose a method to achieve this goal. By computing the minimum driver nodes densities of the partial networks of Erdos–Renyi (ER) networks, scale-free (SF) networks and 23 real networks, we find that our method performs better than random method that chooses nodes randomly. Moreover, we find that the nodes chosen by our method tend to be the essential elements of the whole systems, via studying the nodes chosen by our method of a real human signaling network and a human protein interaction network and discovering that the chosen nodes from these networks tend to be cancer-associated genes. The implementation of our method shows some interesting connections between the structure and the controllability of networks, improving our understanding of the control principles of complex systems.

[1]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Linqiang Pan,et al.  Detection of driver metabolites in the human liver metabolic network using structural controllability analysis , 2014, BMC Systems Biology.

[3]  Yong Xu,et al.  RPCA-Based Tumor Classification Using Gene Expression Data , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[4]  R. Kálmán Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems , 1963 .

[5]  Junan Lu,et al.  Pinning adaptive synchronization of a general complex dynamical network , 2008, Autom..

[6]  A. Vinayagam,et al.  A Directed Protein Interaction Network for Investigating Intracellular Signal Transduction , 2011, Science Signaling.

[7]  Z. Duan,et al.  Complex network synchronizability: analysis and control. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Simo V. Zhang,et al.  A map of human cancer signaling , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  Jie Ren,et al.  Controlling complex networks: How much energy is needed? , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  L. Aravind,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of combinatorial regulation using the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[12]  Linqiang Pan,et al.  Identifying Driver Nodes in the Human Signaling Network Using Structural Controllability Analysis , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[13]  Vito Latora,et al.  Controlling centrality in complex networks , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Cunlai Pu,et al.  Robustness analysis of network controllability , 2012 .

[15]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Controlling edge dynamics in complex networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[16]  Y. Lai,et al.  Optimizing controllability of complex networks by minimum structural perturbations. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer genes , 2014 .

[18]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[19]  K. Goh,et al.  Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[20]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Controllability analysis of networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Noah J. Cowan,et al.  Nodal Dynamics, Not Degree Distributions, Determine the Structural Controllability of Complex Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Endre Csóka,et al.  Emergence of bimodality in controlling complex networks , 2013, Nature Communications.

[23]  J. A. Rodríguez-Velázquez,et al.  Subgraph centrality in complex networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The network takeover , 2011, Nature Physics.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Target control of complex networks , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  F. Garofalo,et al.  Controllability of complex networks via pinning. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  J. Pearson,et al.  Structural controllability of multiinput linear systems , 1976 .