Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues.

Abstract The logic of comparison is taken as a starting point. It is argued that any cross-cultural comparison presupposes a comparison scale, i.e. a scale that is identical across the populations included in a study. Scale identity can be Specified for various levels of measurement. In the second section a simple classification is presented for inferences about cross-cultural differences derived from psychological measurements. Two questions are asked for various categories of inferences, viz., whether they are logically feasible and whether they can be validated empirically. In the third section the statistical analysis of psychometric conditions for equivalence is discussed. The fourth section deals with the problem what alternatives for meaningful interpretation a researcher has if data turn out to be lacking in equivalence. In the fifth section a conceptual problem is raised. namely whether the basic assumption of this article is realistic that psychological concepts are identical across cultures.

[1]  Common Names and "Family Resemblances" , 1958 .

[2]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[3]  T. Cleary.  TEST BIAS: PREDICTION OF GRADES OF NEGRO AND WHITE STUDENTS IN INTEGRATED COLLEGES , 1968 .

[4]  T. Cleary,et al.  An Investigation of Item Bias , 1968 .

[5]  Y. Poortinga.  Cross-cultural comparison of maximum performance tests : some methodological aspects and some experiments with simple auditory and visual stimuli , 1971 .

[6]  H. Triandis.  The analysis of subjective culture , 1973 .

[7]  W. H. Angoff,et al.  ITEM‐RACE INTERACTION ON A TEST OF SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE1 , 1973 .

[8]  M. R. Novick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF SOME MODELS FOR CULTURE-FAIR SELECTION , 1976 .

[9]  D. Magnusson,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Anxiety Responses in an Interactional Frame of Reference , 1978 .

[10]  Leonard A. Marascuilo,et al.  STATISTICAL PROCEDURES FOR IDENTIFYING POSSIBLE SOURCES OF ITEM BIAS BASED ON x2 STATISTICS , 1981 .

[11]  S. H. Irvine,et al.  "Perceptual Speed" and Cognitive Controls , 1981 .

[12]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Cross-Cultural Generalization and Universality , 1982 .

[13]  P. Ekman.  Emotion in the human face , 1982 .

[14]  P. Dasen.  THE CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE: PIAGET AND THE BAOULÉ* , 1984 .

[15]  Andrea Lutz,et al.  The Anthropology of Emotions , 1986 .

[16]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Making inferences from cross-cultural data. , 1986 .

[17]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[18]  E. J. Bijnen,et al.  On Cross-Cultural Comparative Studies with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire , 1986 .

[19]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  Explaining Cross-Cultural Differences , 1987 .

[20]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Detecting Item BIAS in Affective Scales , 1987 .

[21]  H. V. D. Flier,et al.  The meaning of item bias in ability tests , 1988 .

[22]  D. Watkins,et al.  The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research , 1989 .

[23]  John W. Berry,et al.  Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. , 1989 .

[24]  P. Becker,et al.  Evaluation of attitude survey translations an investigation using item response theory. , 1989, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.