Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation

Evaluators face a challenge in responding to a call for greater inclusiveness of marginalized groups. In this presentation, I examine the contribution that transformative theory can make toward meeting this challenge. Transformative scholars assume that knowledge is not neutral, but is influenced by human interests, and that all knowledge reflects the power and social relationships within society, and that an important purpose of knowledge construction is to help people improve society. I propose the use of an inclusive model of evaluation that can address the tension between what is needed accurately represent the experiences of marginalized groups research and the traditional canons of research.

[1]  The landscape of values in evaluation: Charted terrain and unexplored territory , 1997 .

[2]  Patti Lather,et al.  Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post‐structural perspectives , 1992 .

[3]  Peter Reason,et al.  Participation in human inquiry , 1994 .

[4]  James R. Sanders,et al.  The program evaluation standards : how to assess evaluations of educational programs , 1994 .

[5]  J. Oakes,et al.  Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking Decisions , 1995 .

[6]  S. Mathison,et al.  Advantages and Challenges of Using Inclusive Evaluation Approaches in Evaluation Practice , 1998 .

[7]  R. Pollard,et al.  Deaf and hard of hearing people. , 1998 .

[8]  J. Banks.  The Canon Debate, Knowledge Construction, and Multicultural Education , 1993, Diversity, Transformative Knowledge, and Civic Education.

[9]  Invisible Ubiquity: The Surprising Relevance of Disability Issues in Evaluation , 1999 .

[10]  S. Harding.  Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology : What is « Strong Objectivity? » , 1992 .

[11]  J. Banks.  The Historical Reconstruction of Knowledge About Race: Implications for Transformative Teaching , 1995 .

[12]  J. Greene.  Evaluation as Advocacy , 1997 .

[13]  John McLaughlin,et al.  Research Methods in Special Education , 1994 .

[14]  E. Chelimsky.  The Role of Experience in Formulating Theories of Evaluation Practice , 1998 .

[15]  The Issue of Advocacy in Evaluations , 1998 .

[16]  A. Davis.  Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment , 1993 .

[17]  Rhoda K. Unger,et al.  Feminist Methods in Social Research. , 1993 .

[18]  Karen Eileen Kirkhart,et al.  Seeking Multicultural Validity: A Postcard from the Road. , 1995 .

[19]  Donna M. Mertens,et al.  Research methods in education and psychology : integratingdiversity with quantitative & qualitative approaches , 1998 .

[20]  D. Mertens,et al.  Diverse Voices in Evaluation Practice: Feminists, Minorities, and Persons With Disabilities , 1994 .

[21]  Merl Storr,et al.  Feminist Epistemologies , 1994 .

[22]  Anna Madison.  Minority Issues in Program Evaluation. , 1991 .

[23]  M. Oliver.  Changing the Social Relations of Research Production , 1992 .

[24]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Have We Learned Anything New About the Use of Evaluation? , 1998 .