Surface contact and design of fibrillar ‘friction pads’ in stick insects (Carausius morosus): mechanisms for large friction coefficients and negligible adhesion

Many stick insects and mantophasmids possess tarsal ‘heel pads’ (euplantulae) covered by arrays of conical, micrometre-sized hairs (acanthae). These pads are used mainly under compression; they respond to load with increasing shear resistance, and show negligible adhesion. Reflected-light microscopy in stick insects (Carausius morosus) revealed that the contact area of ‘heel pads’ changes with normal load on three hierarchical levels. First, loading brought larger areas of the convex pads into contact. Second, loading increased the density of acanthae in contact. Third, higher loads changed the shape of individual hair contacts gradually from circular (tip contact) to elongated (side contact). The resulting increase in real contact area can explain the load dependence of friction, indicating a constant shear stress between acanthae and substrate. As the euplantula contact area is negligible for small loads (similar to hard materials), but increases sharply with load (resembling soft materials), these pads show high friction coefficients despite little adhesion. This property appears essential for the pads’ use in locomotion. Several morphological characteristics of hairy friction pads are in apparent contrast to hairy pads used for adhesion, highlighting key adaptations for both pad types. Our results are relevant for the design of fibrillar structures with high friction coefficients but small adhesion.

[1]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  Molekulartheorie der äußeren Reibung , 1934 .

[2]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The Area of Contact between Stationary and between Moving Surfaces , 1939 .

[3]  Eleanor H. Slifer,et al.  Vulnerable Areas on the Surface of the Tarsus and Pretarsus of the Grasshopper (Acrididae, Orthoptera); with Special Reference to the Arolium , 1950 .

[4]  A. Schallamach The Load Dependence of Rubber Friction , 1952 .

[5]  L. Roth,et al.  Tarsal structure and climbing ability of cockroaches , 1952 .

[6]  D. H. Kaelble,et al.  Theory and Analysis of Peel Adhesion: Bond Stresses and Distributions , 1960 .

[7]  N. Konstantinova,et al.  The Actual Contact Area and Friction Properties of Elastomers under Frictional Contact with Solid Surfaces , 1971 .

[8]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  The Actual Contact Area and Friction Properties of Elastomers under Frictional Contact with Solid Surfaces , 1972 .

[10]  J. A. Peterson,et al.  Convergent and Alternative Designs in the Digital Adhesive Pads of Scincid Lizards , 1982, Science.

[11]  M. Barquins,et al.  Rubber friction variation with rate and temperature: some new observations , 1986 .

[12]  Shoziro Ishii,et al.  Adhesion of a Leaf Feeding Ladybird Epilachna vigintioctomaculta (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae) on a Virtically Smooth Surface , 1987 .

[13]  W. Smith Analytic solutions for tapered column buckling , 1988 .

[14]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Leg design in hexapedal runners. , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  Hisae Yoshizawa,et al.  Fundamental mechanisms of interfacial friction. 1. Relation between adhesion and friction , 1993 .

[16]  Von B. Derjaguin,et al.  Molekulartheorie der äuβeren Reibung. , 1994 .

[17]  D. F. Ogletree,et al.  Observation of proportionality between friction and contact area at the nanometer scale , 1999 .

[18]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Daniel J. Aneshansley,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a chrysomelid beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea): characterization of the adhesive oil. , 2000 .

[22]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Gorb,et al.  Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny , 2001 .

[25]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[26]  Susanne Schulmeister Morphology and evolution of the tarsal plantulae in Hymenoptera (Insecta), focussing on the basal lineages , 2003 .

[27]  Oliver Betz,et al.  Structure of the tarsi in some stenus species (coleoptera, staphylinidae): External morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion , 2003, Journal of morphology.

[28]  S. Gorb,et al.  Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[29]  Tobias Seidl,et al.  Getting a grip on spider attachment: an AFM approach to microstructure adhesion in arthropods , 2004 .

[30]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evolution of locomotory attachment pads in the Dermaptera (Insecta). , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[31]  T. Endlein,et al.  Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[32]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[34]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy , 2005, Biology Letters.

[35]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  R S Fearing,et al.  High friction from a stiff polymer using microfiber arrays. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[37]  Walter Federle,et al.  Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[38]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  A Revised Interpretation of the Evolution of Attachment Structures in Hexapoda with Special Emphasis on Mantophasmatodea , 2006 .

[39]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[40]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[41]  Walter Federle,et al.  Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  R J Full,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Methods for the Behavioral, Educational, and Social Sciences: An R package , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[44]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Confidence Intervals for Standardized Effect Sizes: Theory, Application, and Implementation , 2007 .

[45]  T. Endlein,et al.  Walking on smooth or rough ground: passive control of pretarsal attachment in ants , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[46]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[47]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  Herbert Walther,et al.  Carbon Nanotube Arrays with Strong Shear Binding-On and Easy Normal Lifting-Off , 2008 .

[49]  Liangti Qu,et al.  Carbon Nanotube Arrays with Strong Shear Binding-On and Easy Normal Lifting-Off , 2008, Science.

[50]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evolutionary scenarios for unusual attachment devices of Phasmatodea and Mantophasmatodea (Insecta) , 2008 .

[51]  Walter Federle,et al.  Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[52]  R. Fearing,et al.  Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[53]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces , 2008 .

[54]  A. Peattie,et al.  Functional demands of dynamic biological adhesion: an integrative approach , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[55]  Christofer J Clemente,et al.  Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  C. H. Nelson Surface ultrastructure and evolution of tarsal attachment structures in Plecoptera (Arthropoda: Hexapoda) , 2009 .

[57]  Jan-Henning Dirks,et al.  Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[58]  Stanislav N Gorb,et al.  Structure and function of the arolium of Mantophasmatodea (Insecta) , 2009, Journal of morphology.

[59]  A. Jagota,et al.  Mechanism of sliding friction on a film-terminated fibrillar interface. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[60]  Walter Federle,et al.  Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[61]  Ullrich Steiner,et al.  Friction ridges in cockroach climbing pads: anisotropy of shear stress measured on transparent, microstructured substrates , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[62]  L Mahadevan,et al.  Cooperative adhesion and friction of compliant nanohairs. , 2010, Nano letters.

[63]  Sachin Goyal,et al.  Buckling of sheared and compressed microfibrils , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[64]  Chung-Yuen Hui,et al.  Numerical study of shearing of a microfibre during friction testing of a microfibre array , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[65]  Sang Heup Moon,et al.  Effect of leaning angle of gecko-inspired slanted polymer nanohairs on dry adhesion , 2010 .

[66]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Functional morphology of the adhesive organs of stick insects (Carausius morosus) , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[67]  R. Fearing,et al.  Effect of fiber geometry on macroscale friction of ordered low-density polyethylene nanofiber arrays. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[68]  Walter Federle,et al.  Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae , 2011, Naturwissenschaften.

[69]  Javaan Chahl,et al.  Vertically displaced optical flow sensors to control the landing of a UAV , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[70]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[71]  H. Wolf,et al.  Adhesive and frictional properties of tarsal attachment pads in two species of stick insects (Phasmatodea) with smooth and nubby euplantulae. , 2012, Zoology.

[72]  Jiaru Chu,et al.  Directional adhesion behavior of a single elastic fiber , 2012 .

[73]  R. Fearing,et al.  Role of counter-substrate surface energy in macroscale friction of nanofiber arrays. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[74]  A. Kabla,et al.  In vivo dynamics of the internal fibrous structure in smooth adhesive pads of insects. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[75]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  On the stability of a rod adhering to a rigid surface: Shear-induced stable adhesion and the instability of peeling , 2012 .

[76]  S. Gorb,et al.  Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata , 2013, Nature Communications.

[77]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Contact compliance effects in the frictional response of bioinspired fibrillar adhesives , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[78]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[79]  David Labonte,et al.  Functionally Different Pads on the Same Foot Allow Control of Attachment: Stick Insects Have Load-Sensitive “Heel” Pads for Friction and Shear-Sensitive “Toe” Pads for Adhesion , 2013, PloS one.

[80]  Walter Federle,et al.  Rapid preflexes in smooth adhesive pads of insects prevent sudden detachment , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[81]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .