Long‐term population dynamics of a migrant bird suggests interaction of climate change and competition with resident species

The separation of abiotic and biotic factors affecting populations and communities is an important step in understanding how climate change can influence ecological processes, but quantifying their relative contribution to community changes is a challenge. We assessed the effect of temperature and species interactions on the population dynamics of a forest bird community with a hierarchical dynamic population model in a Bayesian framework. We used a long-term time-series (1956-2012) of four secondary cavity-nesting birds with similar food and nesting requirements but different migration habits, to analyse the effects of the four species population size and the local weather fluctuations on each species' population dynamics. We found clear evidence of a negative effect of two resident species (blue tit and great tit) on a long-distance migrant (pied flycatcher). Among the residents we only found a competition effect of the great tit on the marsh tit. The birds showed opposite responses to weather: the pied flycatcher favoured colder springs whereas the blue tit and great tit favoured warmer springs. Although alternative mechanisms cannot be ruled out, our results suggest that the resident species (blue tit and great tit) could adjust to increasing spring temperature while the migrant species (pied flycatcher) could not, leading progressively to the exclusion of the pied flycatcher from the area. These results point out the potential role of competitive interactions by providing insightful clues, call for refined research, and support recent efforts to include population dynamics in species distribution models.

[1]  A. Enemar,et al.  Dynamics of a passerine bird community in a small deciduous wood, S Sweden, during 40 years , 1994, Ornis Svecica.

[2]  Aleksi Lehikoinen,et al.  Patterns of climate‐induced density shifts of species: poleward shifts faster in northern boreal birds than in southern birds , 2014, Global change biology.

[3]  S. Auer,et al.  Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds , 2014 .

[4]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Predictors of contraction and expansion of area of occupancy for British birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  R. O’Hara,et al.  Population fluctuations affect inference in ecological networks of multi-species interactions , 2014 .

[6]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates , 2014, Ecography.

[7]  D. Bonte,et al.  Habitat structure mediates spatial segregation and therefore coexistence , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Adaptation of reproductive phenology to climate change with ecological feedback via dominance hierarchies. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  D. Leech,et al.  Climatic effects on breeding grounds are more important drivers of breeding phenology in migrant birds than carry-over effects from wintering grounds , 2013, Biology Letters.

[10]  Alejandro F. Rozenfeld,et al.  The geographic scaling of biotic interactions , 2013 .

[11]  B. Sheldon,et al.  University of Groningen Quantitative Assessment of the Importance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Adaptation to Climate Change in Wild Bird Populations Vedder, , 2013 .

[12]  Martin Green,et al.  Rapid changes in bird community composition at multiple temporal and spatial scales in response to recent climate change , 2013 .

[13]  Cascade J. B. Sorte,et al.  Predicting persistence in a changing climate: flow direction and limitations to redistribution. , 2013 .

[14]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance , 2013 .

[16]  G. Niemi,et al.  Community Ecology , 2013 .

[17]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents , 2012 .

[18]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  Climate change, breeding date and nestling diet: how temperature differentially affects seasonal changes in pied flycatcher diet depending on habitat variation. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  P. Leadley,et al.  Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[20]  F. Schurr,et al.  Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics , 2012 .

[21]  Peter J. Morin,et al.  Community Ecology: Morin/Community Ecology , 2011 .

[22]  C. M. Mutshinda,et al.  A multispecies perspective on ecological impacts of climatic forcing. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[24]  G. Walther Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J. Franklin Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[26]  Gary R. Graves,et al.  Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  A. Newton,et al.  Non-analogous community formation in response to climate change , 2009 .

[28]  C. Dormann,et al.  Static species distribution models in dynamically changing systems: how good can predictions really be? , 2009 .

[29]  Ian P. Woiwod,et al.  What drives community dynamics? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[31]  Ben C. Sheldon,et al.  Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in great tits Parus major , 2009 .

[32]  R. O’Hara,et al.  A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which , 2009 .

[33]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[35]  C. Perrins Tits and their caterpillar food supply , 2008 .

[36]  R. McCleery,et al.  Adaptive Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Climate Change in a Wild Bird Population , 2008, Science.

[37]  Toni Laaksonen,et al.  Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[38]  Lennart Karlsson,et al.  Response to Comment on "Rapid Advance of Spring Arrival Dates in Long-Distance Migratory Birds" , 2007, Science.

[39]  S. Lele,et al.  ESTIMATING DENSITY DEPENDENCE, PROCESS NOISE, AND OBSERVATION ERROR , 2006 .

[40]  Wesley M Hochachka,et al.  Simultaneous effects of phylogenetic niche conservatism and competition on avian community structure. , 2006, Ecology.

[41]  C. Both,et al.  Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird , 2006, Nature.

[42]  C. Both,et al.  Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca travelling from Africa to breed in Europe: Differential effects of winter and migration conditions on breeding date , 2006 .

[43]  Phillip Gienapp,et al.  Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird , 2006, Oecologia.

[44]  Von Fritz-Bernd Ludescher Sumpfmeise(Parus p. palustris L.) und Weidenmeise(P. montanus salicarius Br.) als sympatrische Zwillingsarten , 2005, Journal für Ornithologie.

[45]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , 2004 .

[46]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Bayesian inference in ecology , 2004 .

[47]  S. Carpenter,et al.  ESTIMATING COMMUNITY STABILITY AND ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS FROM TIME‐SERIES DATA , 2003 .

[48]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[49]  C. Both,et al.  Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird , 2001, Nature.

[50]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[51]  S. Engen,et al.  Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird. , 2000, Science.

[52]  C. Thomas,et al.  Birds extend their ranges northwards , 1999, Nature.

[53]  T. Sparks,et al.  Climate change and trophic interactions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  J. Török,et al.  Asymmetric competition between two tit species: a reciprocal removal experiment , 1999 .

[55]  P. Berthold,et al.  25-Year Study of the Population Development of Central European Songbirds: A General Decline, Most Evident in Long-Distance Migrants , 1998, Naturwissenschaften.

[56]  J. Merilä,et al.  Interspecific Competition for Nest Holes Causes Adult Mortality in the Collared Flycatcher , 1995 .

[57]  H. Källander Dangerous exploration: nest-cavity inspections by male Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca , 1994, Ornis Svecica.

[58]  T. E. Martin Nest Predation and Nest SitesNew perspectives on old patterns , 1993 .

[59]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[60]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Competition between blue and great tit for roosting sites in winter: an aviary experiment , 1991 .

[61]  A. Dhondt ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY EFFECTS OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN TITS , 1989 .

[62]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Effects of dispersal date on winter flock establishment and social dominance in marsh tits Parus palustris , 1988 .

[63]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Intraspecific variation in migratory pattern of a partial migrant, the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): an evaluation of different hypotheses , 1987 .

[64]  C. Perrins,et al.  Interspecific interference competition ― Nest sites for blue and great tits , 1986 .

[65]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Habitat shift of the willow tit Parus montanus in the absence of the marsh tit Parus palustris , 1985 .

[66]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[67]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[68]  E. Grey EFFECTS OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR FOOD IN BREEDING BLUE AND GREAT TITS , 1981 .

[69]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Competition Between the Great Tit and the Blue Tit Outside the Breeding Season in Field Experiments , 1980 .

[70]  T. Slagsvold Competition between the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: an experiment. , 1978 .

[71]  A. Dhondt Interspecific competition between great and blue tit , 1977, Nature.

[72]  T. Slagsvold Annual and Geographical Variation in the Time of Breeding of the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in Relation to Environmental Phenology and Spring Temperature , 1976 .

[73]  T. Slagsvold Competition between the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in the breeding season. , 1975 .

[74]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Competition and the structure of bird communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[75]  D. Lack,et al.  Ecological isolation in birds , 1971 .

[76]  J. Krebs Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit , 1971 .

[77]  L. V. Haartman ADAPTATION IN HOLE‐NESTING BIRDS , 1957 .

[78]  D. Lack The natural regulation of animal numbers , 1954 .

[79]  Why environmental scientists are becoming , 2022 .