On shear markets and sharing sheep: The merger of EAR and AIR diphthongs in New Zealand English

A social dialect survey of a New Zealand community documented a change in progress in the pronunciation of the vowels in words such as air and ear . The data support a tentative interpretation that a shift to the variant with the closer onset for AIR words was initiated by middle-aged Pakeha women. This was not followed in any strength by other social groups. More recently there has been a change in the opposite direction, with EAR words being realized by a variant with a more open onset. This is being led by young, working class Pakeha speakers, possibly the women. For some speakers, merger of the two diphthongs is close to completion. The change thus seems to have begun in the past 40 years, but its direction has been reversed in the past 20 years. With the strong following among young speakers for the downward shift toward [eə], this seems the likely direction in which change will continue.

[1]  P. Trudgill The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich , 1974 .

[2]  L. G. Kelly,et al.  The phonemes of New Zealand English , 1966, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[3]  Allan Bell,et al.  New Zealand ways of speaking English , 1990 .

[4]  W. Labov The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[5]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  Language and social networks , 1980 .

[6]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Notes on New Zealand English Phonetics and Phonology , 1986 .

[7]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  The second Great Vowel Shift? , 1979, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[8]  A. Valdman,et al.  Dictionary of Jamaican English , 1967 .

[9]  P. Trudgill NORWICH REVISITED: RECENT LINGUISTIC CHANGES IN AN ENGLISH URBAN DIALECT , 1988 .

[10]  Donn Bayard English around the world: Social constraints on the phonology of New Zealand English , 1991 .

[11]  Kristine L. Fitch,et al.  The Urbanization of Rural Dialect Speakers: A Sociolinguistic Study in Brazil , 1985 .

[12]  Jenny Cheshire,et al.  English around the world : sociolinguistic perspectives , 1991 .

[13]  Joel Sherzer,et al.  Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics , 1985 .

[14]  A. Bell Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[15]  W. Labov,et al.  Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast , 1991, Language Variation and Change.

[16]  William Labov,et al.  Some principles of linguistic methodology , 1972, Language in Society.

[17]  Barbara M. Horvath,et al.  Variation in Australian English , 1985 .

[18]  P. Eckert The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[19]  W. Labov The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[20]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  Observing and Analysing Natural Language , 1987 .

[21]  P. Trudgill Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich , 1972, Language in Society.

[22]  Peter Trudgill,et al.  On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. , 1983 .

[23]  Peter Trudgill,et al.  Sociolinguistic patterns in British English , 1980 .

[24]  Robert D. Rodman,et al.  An Introduction to Language , 1984 .

[25]  L. Bauer The Verb HAVE in New Zealand English , 1989 .