Questionnaire-based social research on opinions of Japanese visitors for communication robots at an exhibition

This paper reports the results of questionnaire-based research conducted at an exhibition of interactive humanoid robots that was held at the Osaka Science Museum, Japan. The aim of this exhibition was to investigate the feasibility of communication robots connected to a ubiquitous sensor network, under the assumption that these robots will be practically used in daily life in the not-so-distant future. More than 90,000 people visited the exhibition. A questionnaire was given to the visitors to explore their opinions of the robots. Statistical analysis was done on the data of 2,301 respondents. It was found that the visitors’ opinions varied according to age; younger visitors did not necessarily like the robots more than elderly visitors; positive evaluation of the robots did not necessarily conflict with negative evaluations such as anxiety; there was no gender difference; and there was almost no correlation between opinions and the length of time spent near the robots.

[1]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  Autonomous behavior control architecture of entertainment humanoid robot SDR-4X , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[2]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot at Science Museum in London , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Humanoid Robots for a Science Museum , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[4]  T. Kanda,et al.  Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[5]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[6]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot , 2001 .

[7]  K. Wada,et al.  Subjective evaluation of seal robot in Brunei , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[8]  Kikuo Fujimura,et al.  The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Yoshiyuki Nakamura,et al.  A Compact Battery-Less Information Terminal for Real World Interaction , 2004, Pervasive.

[10]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in UK , 2002, IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society. IECON 02.

[11]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[12]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Knowledge Compilation Properties of Trees-of-BDDs, Revisited , 2009, IJCAI.

[13]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[14]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Subjective evaluation of a seal robot at the National Museum of Science and Technology in Stockholm , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[15]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  An integrated surveillance system--human tracking and view synthesis using multiple omni-directional vision sensors , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Framework of distributed audition , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[17]  Minoru Asada,et al.  An Overview of RoboCup 2002 Fukuoka/Busan , 2003, RoboCup.

[18]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[19]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Human tracking using floor sensors based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2004, ICPR 2004.