Factors influencing knowledge contribution: An empirical investigation of social networking website users

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop an automated frequently asked question (FAQ) answering system for farmers. This paper presents an approach for calculating the similarity between Chinese sentences based on hybrid strategies. Design/methodology/approach: We analyzed the factors influencing the successful matching between a user's question and a question-answer (QA) pair in the FAQ database. Our approach is based on a combination of multiple factors. Experiments were conducted to test the performance of our method. Findings: Experiments show that this proposed method has higher accuracy. Compared with similarity calculation based on TF-IDF, the sentence surface forms and the semantic relations, the proposed method based on hybrid strategies has a superior performance in precision, recall and F-measure value. Research limitations: The FAQ answering system is only capable of meeting users' demand for text retrieval at present. In the future, the system needs to be improved to meet users' demand for retrieving images and videos. Practical implications: This FAQ answering system will help farmers utilize agricultural information resources more effi ciently. Originality/value: We design the algorithms for calculatingn similarity of Chinese sentences based on hybrid strategies, which integrate the question surface similarity, the question semantic similarity and the question-answer similarity based on latent semantic analysis(LSA) to find answers to a user's question.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[2]  James Blustein,et al.  Knowledge Contribution in Social Media: Exploring Factors Influencing Social Taggers' Acceptance towards Contributing and Sharing Tags , 2012, ICISTM.

[3]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Special Issue on: Knowledge Management in Asia Understanding Seeking from Electronic Knowledge Repositories: , 2022 .

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Exploring Meta-Knowledge for Knowledge Management Systems: A Delphi Study , 2003, ICIS.

[5]  Fan-Chuan Tseng,et al.  A social cognitive framework of knowledge contribution in the online community , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011).

[6]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[9]  Zahra Tohidinia,et al.  Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Chih-Chien Wang,et al.  Knowledge Contribution in the Online Virtual Community: Capability and Motivation , 2006, KSEM.

[11]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  The Role of Virtual Communities as Shopping Reference Groups , 2008 .

[12]  David C. Li,et al.  Online social network acceptance: a social perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[13]  R. Krueger,et al.  Handbook of research methods in personality psychology , 2007 .

[14]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Knowledge management in a collaborative business framework , 2005, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[15]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Moez Limayem,et al.  The Role of Habit in Information Systems Continuance: Examining the Evolving Relationship Between Intention and Usage , 2005, ICIS.

[17]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Habit in the context of IS continuance: theory extension and scale development , 2003, ECIS.

[18]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures , 2003 .

[19]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Drivers Of Knowledge Contribution Quality And Quantity In Online Question And Answering Communities , 2011, PACIS.

[21]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  M. Rothschild Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors , 1999 .

[25]  H. Kelman PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[26]  Hyerin Kim,et al.  Understanding Online Knowledge Contribution in Social Learning Perspective , 2012, ECIS.

[27]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[28]  P. L. Yu,et al.  Habitual Domains , 1991, Operational Research.

[29]  Shih-Wei Chou,et al.  Why do members contribute knowledge to online communities? , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..